Posted on 11/16/2008 4:49:18 AM PST by Islander7
Unfortunately, the 1980 graphic doesn’t show snowfall and the starburst image prominant near the center represents “old ice”, a major part of the GW argument.
Your date does show a very rapid growth this year compared to last by about 2.75 weeks as I have been tracking it the past month.
GW will have to be put on ice this year in the Artic, at this rate.
What many pepople are beginning to suspect is that the mistakes admitted are in allowing the mistakes of data being discovered; look for the modelers to hold this even closer to the chest from now on.
How long have I been questioning the practice of adjusting the raw data instead of creating two models for comparison?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.