Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's political potential
Boston Globe ^ | 11/16/08 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 11/16/2008 1:26:52 AM PST by MartinaMisc

THE 2008 presidential campaign may be over, but Sarah Palin's moment in the spotlight has yet to run its course.

In a media marathon last week, the Republican Party's vice presidential nominee sat down for interviews with CNN's Larry King and Wolf Blitzer; had Matt Lauer of the "Today" show up to Wasilla for a family dinner; and told Fox News's Greta Van Susteren about getting the call from John McCain on her cellphone while she was admiring the local produce at the Alaska State Fair. She disdained the Republican "jerks" who spread anonymous rumors painting her as geographically illiterate, and vehemently denied the accusation that she had milked the campaign for a $150,000 wardrobe for herself and her family.

All that was a prelude to her star turn at the Republican Governors Association meeting in Miami, where she met reporters at a press conference, drew standing ovations from several hundred GOP donors, and humorously updated her fellow governors on what she'd been doing since last year's meeting.

"I had a baby," she told them. "I did some traveling; I very briefly expanded my wardrobe; I made a few speeches; I met a few VIPs, including those who really impact society, like Tina Fey."

Of course she was asked whether she plans to run for president in 2012, and of course she deflected the question. "The future is not that 2012 presidential race; it's next year and our next budgets," she said. But there can't be much doubt that Palin has become the brightest star in the GOP firmament. A whopping 91 percent of Republicans have a favorable view of her, according to a recent Rasmussen poll, and she is the runaway favorite when they are asked to rank possible contenders for the party's 2012 presidential nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; jacoby; mccain; nextusapresident; palin; pds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: prairiebreeze
It's pointless. I've yet to see this person post anything that didn't circle back around to a Palin bash. Frankly it's become scary.
21 posted on 11/16/2008 4:19:42 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: redk

Bwaahaa!

I ain’t skeerd..


22 posted on 11/16/2008 4:22:15 AM PST by prairiebreeze ( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
You tear her down to build Romney up, eh.

Forget that....They both had equal opportunities in the spotlight...

..and no one is clamoring for Romney's quotes, reactions, opinions 24/7.

23 posted on 11/16/2008 4:22:15 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

“She doesn’t have the skills to lead a nation. Sure, she can talk to her fan club, they are willing to overlook her lack of qualifications. It makes the GOP look bad. What are her real accomplishments?”

Care to list specifics there, rodeomomma?

I see a person that has Christian values and morals (what our nation was founded upon), is ready to do the right thing, can take an economy that is failing and within 2 years giving dividends to its constituents, is not afraid to call out peers that misrepresent the people who voted for them, runs a top military organization (seen any Bear bombers over Canada lately?), can stand toe-to toe with foreign allies as well as enemies and not back down if the water starts to boil .... these are just a few things I look at in a world leader. President Bush was okay on 1 of the 3; Clinton batted zero; Bush senior might have got 2 out of 3; Reagan hit homeruns; Carter (see Clinton’s score) ... I would support a person like Palin no matter what gender because I could shake hands with her, look her in the eye, and know that I can trust her. Not many politicians nowadays that I could say the same for.

So to sum up your thoughts: doesn’t have the skills to lead, lack of qualifications, no real accomplishments .... watch out for that koolaid, it has been “liberally” spiked.


24 posted on 11/16/2008 4:22:52 AM PST by Mustng959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

“I love God and my country and I will not vote for Palin if she is nominated....”

Brillant!! The first person who has emerged among Conservatives who is smart, true to principle, and a leader who has a real chance, and you want to go work for a third party. My advice is to go NOW! Don’t let the door hit yer b*** on the way out! It is my guess you probably can’t find one pure enough for you, unless it only consists of you as it’s membership. Lord help us if we all splinter looking for political nirvana!


25 posted on 11/16/2008 4:25:40 AM PST by gbscott1954 (Sarah 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Reagan only succeeded in inspiring Democrats four years after he was a national political candidate. And the left succeeded very well, thank you, in supposedly marginalizing him as a quack-fringe, stupid actor in 1976, thank you.


26 posted on 11/16/2008 4:26:26 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

Rick Perry couldn’t win Texas, in the very unlikely event that he would be nominated. He is a RINO of the worst kind.


27 posted on 11/16/2008 4:26:35 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: idov

In other words,Alaska is the Northernmost Southern State—where women are REAL women—secure,smart,hard-working,plain-spoken,faith-filled and rock-ribbed conservative.Thus Sarah’s popularity there and here in my South—the roots and branches of conservative power in America.
McCain won with the liberal votes here in our SC primary because it was open and the true conservative candidates split the conservative vote.And as history proves,if one wins South Carolina,one wins the Republican nomination.
Palin or Jindal would give our beloved Sanford a run for his money in our 2012 primary. Yet no matter who wins,Obama would be defeated by any of them because Obama,no matter the MSM polls,is a stuck on stupid socialist.
All three need to announce their presidential intentions as soon as possible—even now! Because (as Obama demonstrated) it gets attention,seduces financial interest and sells the lack of faith America has in the incumbant.
In the meantime,Sarah needs to become a regular on Fox News.Not because of anything to do with politics—though she would be a refreshing change of pace,but because the Fox News “image enhancers” i.e.,cosmetic experts,are the best in the world.
Look what they did for a once plain girl like Greta Van Susteren.Think of what they could do for a babe like Sarah over the next four years.
It can’t hurt to steal some of the shallow idiot voters who fell for Obama’s “looks.”


28 posted on 11/16/2008 4:31:54 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Obama democracy is the democratization of decline.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Right now, I would take Governor Palin over the VERY incompetent President-Elect Obama in a New York nanosecond.


29 posted on 11/16/2008 4:32:59 AM PST by Twinkie (REPENT! Look Up! The Lord's Return Is At Hand . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
Have you viewed or read transcript of the cheerleader's conference on energy? She's more than ably articulate, and she is more appealing, more levelheaded and more wise than the likes of people such as Perry or Pawlenty who covet power and prestige and lack the altruistic ambition that drives Palin.

I'm confident Reagan and Thatcher, as well as Thomas Jefferson, would have much admired this grand lady who personifies Thomas J's ideal of the citizen-politician.

30 posted on 11/16/2008 4:33:01 AM PST by jla (Sarah - True heir of Reagan conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

I admire the courage of your dissent in this forum.
I disagree with you of course yet I welcome your challenge as Sarah would.

No disrespect,but I will consider more the Freeper consensus on this matter—it has worked pretty well so far.


31 posted on 11/16/2008 4:39:53 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Obama democracy is the democratization of decline.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

No candidate/President is any better than the people they select to advise them. NOBODY does it alone.

So the very best the American Electorate can do is vote someone into office with a base of solid values.

Combine those solid values with the ability to get people fired up, and you’ve got something to get excited about...


32 posted on 11/16/2008 4:40:20 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Reagan and Maggie were conservatives.

Sarah is a conservative.

I’m not sure what you are, but I know you don’t have the core of that philosophy at heart or you wouldn’t be behaving similiar to Kathleen Parker.

If you think we care if you are involved in an ‘08 run? You value yourself too highly. :)


33 posted on 11/16/2008 4:48:09 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Gov. Sarah Palin '08 -- President Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

People forget that Reagan was called a dumb rube by the media, just like Palin is today. Carter actually wanted to run against Reagan in 1980 because Carter thought that Reagan was too right wing to appeal to moderates and couldn’t win the general election. We know how that worked out.

One thing that I think that Palin has in her favor is that after four years of a corrupt Obama administration the public will want a honest reformer. My problem is that if Bobby Jindal runs for POTUS in 2012, I will have a hard time deciding who to vote for, Jindal or Palin. I like them both.


34 posted on 11/16/2008 4:57:19 AM PST by Ticonderoga34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

What a crock. Sarah was overhandled. When Sarah was let free, she was intelligent, articulate, and as capable of anyone. What candidate running in the last 3 elections did you considered qualified. Kerry, Obama, Bush, Gore? I would take Sarah over all of them in a heartbeat. No, she is no Reagan, but she is head and shoulders better than that group.


35 posted on 11/16/2008 5:03:13 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MartinaMisc

bttt


36 posted on 11/16/2008 5:05:06 AM PST by petercooper (1/20/13 - Change I can believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
I do not believe she can embrace all three pillars of Conservatism,

Just out of idle curiousity, which is she missing?

37 posted on 11/16/2008 5:11:27 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (rules of governance in a free society: mind your own business, keep your hands to yourself - PJ O'R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

It’s that woman against woman thang. It’s for real and it’s not attractive.


38 posted on 11/16/2008 5:14:19 AM PST by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
What are her real accomplishments?

I suppose you would feel better if she spent her life hanging out with Commies, terrorists, and drug dealers, and whose great accomplishments include working for Acorn and defeating the Born-Alive Act.

39 posted on 11/16/2008 5:14:27 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WillRain
Palin and Jindal and Sanford can all be good choices in eight years.

I would add Haley Barbour to that group.

There are a number of republicans I could support and I definitely would prefer a governor to a DC insider.

40 posted on 11/16/2008 5:23:46 AM PST by NEPA (Save a cow, tip a beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson