Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PghBaldy

How long will people keep tilting at this windmill?


10 posted on 11/15/2008 6:48:29 AM PST by Taking Congress back in 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Taking Congress back in 2008

Tilting at windmills? Have you noticed your screen name?


21 posted on 11/15/2008 6:55:52 AM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

There are 17 lawsuits in 12 states concerning the eligibility of Barack Obama per Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

He has retained the counsel of 2 legal firms to fight this issue, an issue which could be simply solved by just presenting a vault copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate.


24 posted on 11/15/2008 6:57:12 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

“How long will people keep tilting at this windmill”

Until the blades are feathered (proof not required) or it pumps water (proof not required), that would be my guess. Do you not want this resolved?


35 posted on 11/15/2008 7:03:41 AM PST by Peter Horry (Mount Up Everybody and Ride to the Sound of the Guns .. Pat Buchanan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


49 posted on 11/15/2008 7:10:49 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

>> How long will people keep tilting at this windmill? <<

As long as there survives a “mentally tilted” windbag named Keyes.

(I suppose the man deserves our sympathy more than our scorn.)


72 posted on 11/15/2008 7:27:59 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008
How long will people keep tilting at this windmill?

For as long as some of us care about the constitution.

That should be self evident on this forum.

76 posted on 11/15/2008 7:33:12 AM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008
How long will people keep tilting at this windmill?

.... as long as it takes. No COLB, NO BAMA

78 posted on 11/15/2008 7:33:44 AM PST by DHC-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

How about until the requirements of our Constitution are met...?


85 posted on 11/15/2008 7:41:06 AM PST by TXnMA (To anger a conservative, lie about him. To anger a liberal -- tell the truth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

That’s funny... This issue could easily be eliminated by simply providing the required (and constitutionally mandated) documentation, yet no such document has been provided to refute the assertion.

Before I could even sign my my 12-year old son for football, I had to provide his birth certificate; why is it not reasonable to ask the same of someone who seeks the presidency?


104 posted on 11/15/2008 8:01:24 AM PST by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2008

I don’t know. How long did the left tilt at the “election was stolen” windmill with W?

We’ll probably tilt at this windmill just as long.


121 posted on 11/15/2008 8:19:53 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Taking Congress back in 2010

You are inverting the moral emphasis of this argument. All this speculation, correct or not; has come about because this lying crypto-marxist thug from the most corrupt environs of leftist Chicago sewer politics has ascended to POTUS-elect status with the willing aquiescence of the MSM. The MSM was hell-bent on concealing this usurper’s background because they wanted him to be elected. Now, in a classic case of blame the messenger, those of us who belive in the constitution are being reviled for insisting that a POTUS comply with a basic requirement that most of us unhesitatingly conform with when seeking a driver’s license.

The arrogance and effrontery of this lying bastid is breathtaking. The founders knew that they were not natural born citizens, so they had to include language in Art II Sec 1 that exempted THEM. Does this fraud think that he is better than Washington, Madison, Adams, and Jefferson in that sense? Apparently he does, and with the submission of enough folks who think like you, he will suceed in usurping and corrupting the Executive Branch of government. This situation presents the very real posssibility of impelling this great nation beyond a constitutional crisis toward a civil war.

Finally, consider the implications of a man who would undertake these devious machinations to knowingly assume an office that he has no constitutional claim to, and than to see this same counterfeit president elect take an oath to defend that constitution. I believe that such a man would be willing to impose ANY sort or despotism or tyranny upon us to retain power.


201 posted on 11/15/2008 6:18:09 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson