Please show me where I used the term tinfoil. If you are going to accuse me, please provide proof.
You accused me of personal attacks—I quote you: “and using words that attack the people rather than their arguments”. When did I attack a person. Please provide a quote.
How in the world does this not qualify as a conspiracy?! From the dictionary: “a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose”
When did I claim Republicans are not moderate enough? Please quote. I pointed out that we need moderates to provide the numbers to overthrow Obama in 4 years.
You basically said that Repubs need to cavill to moderates. You didn’t say the word “cavill” but that’s what you meant. I already said that if you did not say the dread word “tinfoil”, I apologize. My memory says you did, but I am not perfect.
Regarding my supposed accusation accusing you of personal attacks, what I meant was this, and I think I was crystal clear: You have not said one. damn. thing about the actual discussion at hand, only used loaded words that tinge the discussion and therefore, obviously, the people who are having it and investing time and energy researching it, with wingnutism which will not appeal to the moderates.
And I am not saying you used the word wingnut.
If you reply to me again I’m not going to bother addressing you. I remember discussions with you a couple of years ago about conseravtive social issues and you are a social liberal, and that’s your position and your business. If you really are interested in whether Obama is eligible to be US President, you can read up. If you want to nitpick and subtly criticize the people discussing it, that’s your right but I have no interest in engaging with you on that level.
We need moderates like we need a hole in the head.