Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soliton

I can’t find a source for the rule on the web, but I now know more than I ever wanted about the British peerage. WikiAnswers has this, but without a reference:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_address_a_former_ambassador

I tried “courtesy titles” and “styles of address” - even with quote marks the results are primarily garbage. I remember Mrs. Cates covering this in 4th (or 5th - I had her two years in a row) grade English class, but since I can’t document it, I won’t argue with your usage.


554 posted on 11/15/2008 2:14:17 AM PST by nina0113 (Hugh Akston is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: nina0113

I only asked because I couldn’t find anything either. Also, a search for “former ambassador” turns up lots of hits.


555 posted on 11/15/2008 3:30:50 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]

To: nina0113
I tried “courtesy titles” and “styles of address” - even with quote marks the results are primarily garbage.

It is in accepted common usage, unless you are Governor of Alaska, then you are addressed as Mayor, or Wasilla Hillbilly.

Get over it common rules change by default, else why would gay be the acceptable substitute for Homosexual?

Who in their right mind would have thought there would have to be a constitutional amendment to define marriage, since it had been in common usage for a few thousand years.

593 posted on 11/15/2008 9:55:12 AM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson