To: aWolverine
In the case of America, I would almost invert the order of occurrence.I take it you do not dispute the outcome?
To: The_Media_never_lie
I take it you do not dispute the outcome?
I dispute it only insofar as I don't think it goes far enough. When any other country over the last 150 years went belly-up, the rest of the planetary economy was, more or less, there to act as a buffer to soak up the "thud". This time, there are *no* buffers, no rich "other" countries. Also, other national bankruptcies enjoyed a homogeneous population. We are, in fact, extremely Balkanized already, with only our freedom to travel and exceptional wealth keeping us from chopping each other up in the streets. I think the effect of this collapse is, for a moderate term anyway, going to make money obsolete. Drinkable water, food, weapons, tools, shelter, basic medical and hygiene supplies. These will be the precious commodities of the early 21st century.
To: The_Media_never_lie
Not having had time to read the article (which I will do) I agree with you as to the inversion. Yes, I agree the outcome is bound to be similar.
37 posted on
11/14/2008 12:52:42 PM PST by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(No longer wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
To: The_Media_never_lie
52 posted on
11/14/2008 1:50:23 PM PST by
Haddon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson