Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aWolverine
In the case of America, I would almost invert the order of occurrence.

I take it you do not dispute the outcome?

5 posted on 11/14/2008 12:14:25 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: The_Media_never_lie
I take it you do not dispute the outcome?

I dispute it only insofar as I don't think it goes far enough. When any other country over the last 150 years went belly-up, the rest of the planetary economy was, more or less, there to act as a buffer to soak up the "thud". This time, there are *no* buffers, no rich "other" countries. Also, other national bankruptcies enjoyed a homogeneous population. We are, in fact, extremely Balkanized already, with only our freedom to travel and exceptional wealth keeping us from chopping each other up in the streets. I think the effect of this collapse is, for a moderate term anyway, going to make money obsolete. Drinkable water, food, weapons, tools, shelter, basic medical and hygiene supplies. These will be the precious commodities of the early 21st century.
20 posted on 11/14/2008 12:32:51 PM PST by aWolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Not having had time to read the article (which I will do) I agree with you as to the inversion. Yes, I agree the outcome is bound to be similar.


37 posted on 11/14/2008 12:52:42 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (No longer wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: The_Media_never_lie

My thoughts exactly.


52 posted on 11/14/2008 1:50:23 PM PST by Haddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson