See, you are getting your panties all in a wad based solely on the sex of the person in question. Your argument is no different than the people who call me racist because i refused to vote for 0bama, even though I have voted for a black person for president in the past.
I never said “the sacrifices and accomplishments of our troops are silly at all. I believe you are puttting WAY to much into the sex of the person being discussed, and it’s obvious you posted this to whine about any comment that came up questioning why someone would be promoted to the position as being sexist. Now, isn’t that sexist?
I don’t give a damn what sex (race, religion, ec. ad nauseum) the person is, I merely want the most qualified for the spot. Is a logistics person more qualified for the spot than any other candidate?
Are you a veteran?
Strike that last sentence, it should read “Is Dunwoody more qualified for the spot than any other candidate?”
We were discussing the offensive remarks made on this thread. I am not being sexist by complaining about the insulting remarks about her lack of a penis. If you missed those remarks, go back and look. I see nothing sexist about objecting to that vile crapola.
General Dunwoody deserves the respect due her rank. If you have some evidence that she has stolen the glory, present it. The Army does not hand out rank based on genitalia. Nor should they.
Grow up, and recognize the sacrifices and accomplishments that have kept you free. And quit attacking the messenger.