See, there you go again with a thoroughly sexist post, that’s not even close to factual.
I think your post is a perfect example of penis envy.
You are happy a female was appointed. Others who care about the troops (and not just the fact a female was appointed) quesion EVERYONE who is appointed to such a post, regardless of gender.
Tell you what, when you settle down, and can avoid blatantly sexist remarks, and are willing to use facts to discuss this, we can carry forth, k?
In other words, you agree with the sexist remarks about her lack of a penis, and you find my objection to those sexist remarks to be sexist. Thank you for your input.