Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCjim

The shrinking percentage of taxpaying Americans is a very dangerous trend. Eventually, as Tytler observed, the non-taxpaying masses will vote themselves largesse from the public treasury, and us “rich” folks (aka “taxpayers”) will be outvoted, out-represented, and outnumbered. And the nation will be insolvent.

If you have earned income, you should pay taxes — something, anything.

At what point do we invert the Founders’ cry to “no representation without taxation”? But of course, that will never happen.

How about this: If you receive more money from the federal government — either by interest income or wealth redistribution — than you pay in, you don’t vote.


6 posted on 11/13/2008 4:26:52 PM PST by branch15_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: branch15_5
How about this: If you receive more money from the federal government — either by interest income or wealth redistribution — than you pay in, you don’t vote.

Sounds like a plan!

8 posted on 11/13/2008 4:28:48 PM PST by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: branch15_5
How about this: If you receive more money from the federal government — either by interest income or wealth redistribution — than you pay in, you don’t vote.

Up until 1933, there was an instrument called "the pauper's oath". If you were on any form of public assistance, you were required to sign that document and give up your right to vote until you were producing again.

The Great Depression killed it, and then the 26th Amendment finished it off for good.

16 posted on 11/13/2008 4:32:09 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: branch15_5
If you receive more money from the federal government — either by interest income or wealth redistribution — than you pay in, you don’t vote.

You disenfranchising fascist (/sarc), how could you suggest that 80% of the democRAT party be declared ineligable to vote themselves benefits from the public tough.

26 posted on 11/13/2008 4:35:35 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Those who live by the sword risk being shot by those who donÂ’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: branch15_5

Does your plan rule out dead people voting?


76 posted on 11/13/2008 6:03:03 PM PST by stockpirate ($300 MDUS in illegal donations to O's campaign. Stolen election, where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: branch15_5
Eventually, as Tytler observed, the non-taxpaying masses will vote themselves largesse from the public treasury, and us “rich” folks (aka “taxpayers”) will be outvoted, out-represented, and outnumbered. And the nation will be insolvent.

We have reached that point over the last few years. It is really time for the productive to slow down and gently shrug IMHO.

85 posted on 11/13/2008 7:36:52 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: branch15_5

one refinement (with acknowledgement to R.A.H.) - you don’t serve, you don’t vote.

Join the Mobile Infantry!


92 posted on 11/13/2008 8:27:36 PM PST by redlegplanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson