Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
"Those of us who believe that the right to life is unalienable shall continue to pursue the protection of unborn children through the ratification of Personhood Amendments, state by state. "

Excellent!

The belief that the 14th Amendment protects the yet-to-be-born is historically unfounded, Constitutionally illogical, and unconservative.

Sure, such opinions - like Roe v Wade- are rendered by the courts. But they're wrong.

85 posted on 11/14/2008 1:03:33 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
The belief that the 14th Amendment protects the yet-to-be-born is historically unfounded, Constitutionally illogical, and unconservative.

Yours was pretty much the position of Justice Blackmun, the author of Roe vs. Wade. However, in the text of Roe, even he admitted that if the unborn are persons that they are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

By the way, you stand in opposition to Ronald Reagan's position on life. The Reagan plank in the Republican platform explicitly asserts the personhood of the unborn and their protection by the Fourteenth Amendment.

You do stand foursquare with Gerald R. Ford, though.

It's your position that is illogical. The Constitution itself states as its ultimate purpose the securing of the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves AND OUR POSTERITY.

The only way you can change that is to change the clear and simple meaning of words.

87 posted on 11/14/2008 1:14:12 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("Barack Obama is black like me only in the sense that we both have dark skin." - Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson