Posted on 11/13/2008 9:46:23 AM PST by EternalVigilance
It’s time for new leadership in the pro-life movement and, thankfully, that leadership is now beginning to rise up all across America. This is happening under the banner of the Personhood Movement, which recognizes the personhood of all unborn children and the fact that they are therefore protected by the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.
For more than three decades, the existing leadership of the pro-life movement has pursued a strategy of regulating abortion rather than ending it. Instead of insisting on our nation’s most important founding principle of the protection of the unalienable God-given right to life for all, by forgetting this timeless principle upon which our liberty is premised, they have thereby ceded the moral, political, and legal battle to the enablers of the abortion industry.
This failed strategy is now putting our posterity further into danger’s path. President-elect Obama has promised to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which will, in effect, nullify any incremental pro-life law or regulation that has been passed over the last 35 years. While National Right to Life and their compromised allies will never acknowledge it, this would leave these “conventional” pro-life organizations no alternative but to embrace Human Life Amendments. Unfortunately, NRLC has consistently worked to undermine these efforts in every state where one has been introduced.
Right to Life of Michigan is one of the largest and most highly esteemed conventional pro-life organizations in the nation. And yet, they opposed Michigan’s Human Life Amendment in 2006. From the Grand Rapids Press, March, 2006:
“Rather than try to directly ban abortion, Right to Life of Michigan wants to put its resources into electing a U.S. senator and governor who oppose abortion,” said Paul Miller, chairman of the group's PAC.
Predictably, since then, they have lost all of it: the Human Life Amendment, one race for Governor and two for the U.S. Senate. In fact, one of these U.S. Senate candidates lost his RLM pro-life endorsement precisely because he supported the Human Life Amendment petition drive.
Let’s fast forward to today. In Michigan, RLM prides itself on being an 800-pound political gorilla. How did this political powerhouse fare in the 2008 election? Let’s take a look:
1. They lost 17 State Representative seats.
2. They lost 12 Circuit or District Court judges.
3. They lost one position on the Wayne State Board of Regents.
4. They lost the University of Michigan Board of Regents.
5. They lost one position on the Michigan State University Board of Trustees.
6. They lost one position on the State Board of Education.
7. They lost an incumbent Michigan State Supreme Court Justice.
8. They lost two incumbent U.S. Congressmen.
9. They lost the U.S. Senate race.
10. They lost the presidential race.
11. They lost the fight against Proposal 2, which legalizes and funds embryonic stem cell research.
These so-called “leaders” have now proven, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that their supposed pragmatism is really nothing more than unprincipled shortsightedness. Their total ineffectiveness, their complete irrelevance to anything real, is now apparent to all.
Proposal 2 passed because of these people’s lack of conviction and focus on the true crime of embryonic stem cell research: it kills human beings, persons who have just as much right to live as anybody else. A mountain of money was used, not to make the case for preserving the integrity of America’s most precious principles, but instead focused entirely on money issues. The true stakes were obscured by their trivialization of the most important moral issue of our time.
Had they shown a human face, represented by the thousands of living “snowflake babies,” those children who had formerly been frozen embryos but who were adopted out and given life, as a comparison with the sterile medical term, “stem cell research,” the results would have likely been far different. This doesn’t even take into account the huge amount of money that RLM, through its political arms, spent trying to elect a man who ran ads in the recent election promising to spend millions more of the taxpayers’ dollars on life-destroying embryonic stem cell research: Senator John McCain.
The extent to which Right to Life of Michigan is willing to play all political sides was best conveyed by the Michigan State Senate Leader, Mike Bishop (R) when, in 2004, he and his pro-abortion Democrat opponent received a co-endorsement from RLM.
Senator Bishop:
“For me, the issue of life is a core conviction not subject to the whims of political expediency. I stand by my votes for life and with those who supported me, but I cannot stand up for an organization, which through a co-endorsement, makes a mockery of the principles and ideals upon which the organization was founded. If a candidate with a 92% approval rating from Planned Parenthood is as worthy of endorsement as the candidate with a 100% pro-life voting record, then something is fundamentally flawed in the way that organization chooses their endorsements. Then again maybe it is a wake-up call for the grassroots supporters to reevaluate who their leaders are.”
But there is a new day dawning. We have been inspired this year by the courageous efforts of those in Colorado who worked tirelessly to put their Personhood Amendment, which recognizes the unalienable right to life of all from the moment of fertilization, on the ballot. Their efforts resulted in the gathering of more than twice as many petition signatures as required to do so. While the effort did not succeed at the ballot box this time, there is new momentum all over the nation to introduce and pass Personhood and Human Life Amendments. One of the brand new organizations founded to help in these efforts, Personhood USA, cites 16 states that already have initiatives underway.
So all is not lost. New leadership brings with it new hope. Those of us who believe that the right to life is unalienable shall continue to pursue the protection of unborn children through the ratification of Personhood Amendments, state by state. For the sake of our babies, let us hope and pray that the compromised leaders of the past come to their senses and begin to do what is right. Regardless of whether they do or not, we are going forward, with or without them.
Judy Zabik is spokesperson for Flint Area Right to Life and Black Americans for Life (http://www.FlintRTL.com) in Flint, Michigan, Board member of Genesee County Republican Party, Treasurer for Alan Keyes for President (http://www.alankeyes.com), and Treasurer for America’s Independent Party National Committee (http://www.aipnews.com).
How’s that workin’ for ya so far?
Indeed.
Better than your effort.
Very true. What are you running for in 2010? Want to run the RNC?
Oh how clever.
::rolling eyes::
So tell me, how much failure will it take for you to change tactics?
From what to what?
From focusing on something that has not worked to something that uses the pro-choice argument against its own proponents.
1. Please be more specific about “something that has not worked” regarding particular pro-life approaches and arguments.
2. The “pro-choice” movement, and their argument, is definitive tribalism and thus not subject to being universalized along the lines that you pursue.
1. It would more efficient for you to say what has worked: i.e. nothing.
2. It’s only definitive tribalism if you go along with the pro-choice definitions.
The same people tried to float the idea that minorities were incapable of racism and bigotry by “definition,” too.
1. You, not I, are the one claiming that particular pro-life approaches are ineffective and thus it is you, not I, who then needs to identify exactly which pro-life approaches are being deemed ineffective and why.
2. Feminism is the most entrenched form of tribalism on Earth. That is why the entire pretext of using one of their arguments for a proposal involving universal application is intrinsically oxymoronic.
I admit it is not easy saying this and it tries my logic,
I think if we had 65,000,000 Catholics and additionally some others as the Rosary is a universal prayer saying this prayer, sure, this country could be saved.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2095715/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2119067/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2119064/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2116461/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2099923/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2099366/posts
1. No i don’t. Falling for your rhetorical rope-a-dope by trying to get me to catalog the self-evident is a waste of my effort.
2. Pontification is not proof. There is no reason the feminist rationale for abortion could not be appropriated by men, thus forcing the social dynamic back to where it has been since time immemorial.
You were actively supplying one part of that, so I congenially offered the rope part to complete the rhyme.
Can you provide a single data point in support of the efficacy of your assertion?
Oh but wouldn’t it be grand if your clever repartee were useful for something other than preserving your self-esteem when prudence would suggest reflection.
How can their be documented healings at Lourdes? Hundreds of them and that is searchable on the internet, just try “healings” and “Lourdes.”
“For those who believe in God, no explanation is necessary;
for those who do not believe in God, no explanation is possible.”
Lourdes is not an answer to my question. It is an evasion.
Can you provide a single example of societal repentance in response to the prayers of the “faithful?”
If you want to read about societal repentence, google Charles Finney, the evangelist.
As the second hit for Charles Finney is a denunciation on spurgeon.org (the first being a wiki ref.) perhaps you could elaborate on exactly what was repented of.
Well, just go out and buy a book on Finney instead of digging through thousands of google links.
Cities and towns were greatly affected and had much change through his ministry and prayers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.