In the same amount of time and with less effort, you could have hammered out reams of support for your assertions on the election question but instead you try to poke a finger in our eyes by calling people dimwits and moronic dolts because they contradict you or won't agree to being wrong.
As a result your comments invite the sarcasm they deserve and receive.
And since you really do take yourself too seriously that chaps your hide enough to goad you into even more amusing statements with a, “I am the one with the facts here”, kind of flavor.
You couldn't see that happening? You can't understand that we can only be insulted by people we respect? And saying
“Why don’t you people read some history before spouting nonsense? Stop digging and just admit you don’t know what you are talking about.” doesn't engender respect?
Waving a red flag and watching the bull charge around the pasture chasing it may be amusing but it doesn't make the bull look too smart. AND, even the amusing becomes boring after a while so I'll leave you with something you'll cherish...are you ready?....THE LAST WORD. All yours and welcome to it!
Me? I'm off to my Gib Ed classes to study for my Notary Public test. Want me e-mail you when I pass?
*In the same amount of time and with less effort,*
Said the man who then went on to post hundreds of characters in the pursuit of nothing.
*you could have hammered out reams of support for your assertions on the election question *
Assertions?
Hitler was never elected.
The Nazis never won a majority of seats in the Reichstag.
The post-enabling act plebiscites were neither free nor fair.
These are historical facts, unless you’re David Irving.
You sit in front of the world’s greatest research device. A simple Google search will confirm any of the above “assertions” in about a million places.