The fact that someone in her age (mid-40s), and in her position has to bone up on these things is a strong signal that she's just not cut out for the job.
It shows she lacks curiosity and passion about public policy and political philosophy. In other words, it means she's a lightweight, and I don't want someone like that to be president.
Was Ronald Reagan a lightweight? I don’t think he went to an Ivy League college, and even broadcast Cubs game, faking the play the play back in the day. Did he drop out of college to football to pay his bills?
And i am old enough to remember being told by the MSM that Reagan was the sure loser against Carter if he was nominated. The he beats the crap out of Carter and Mondale.
She has some obvious skills but is still partly a diamond in the rough. i do not understand some FReepers blatant disrespect for a good woman. Freepers shouldnt let the MSM nominate their POTUS candidate. And even the Country clubbers may warm up to SP if in 2012 or 2106 whenever if it looks like she can win it. I never thought such a naiive do-nothing Marxist like Obama could win. Give us a few terrorist attacks and maybe any GOP candidate can beat him. Or maybe Jindal will be the man, that’s fine too.