can I take back my vote for McCain? lol
mccain lost because of the bailout
WTF is up with your profile? Are you some kind of hacker?
Gotta love this woman.
Can I nominate Anne for Chair of RNC?
Your link goes back to last weeks article???
Did he get a "thrill" up his leg?
Who would ever take seriously a dork who writes for The New York Times? They get a lot of readers who follow the elliptical metrocon mazes of intellectual neo-conservatism at The New York Times, do they? As edited and approved by the Council on Foreign Relations... Conservatism Lite.
bttt
McCain is hardly Bob Dole. Dole only received 41% of the vote in 1996. McCain got 46%. If not for the Wall Street meltdown and subsequent bailout disaster, I think it easily would have been 48% or more. Given Bush’s monumental unpopularity, Obama’s massive spending advantage, and the most biased media coverage EVER, I think McCain’s showing is actually pretty remarkable.
Excuse me... WHERE ARE THE PICS? I believe FR has a standing rule when Ann Coulter is discussed. Come on, no slacking!
Let’s not forget we lost against CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, all the leftist news papers and millions and millions and millions of dollars donated to obama’s campaign.
With all that against us, I think McCain did a surprisingly good job (thanks to Palin) at fighting a fixed against him fight.
WE all Voted for Sarah Palin! The one thing that McLame did good was choose Sarah as his running mate:-). We tought we learned Our Lessons well with the virtual slaughter of Sleepy, Boring Archiac Bob DOLE! Then, exactly twelve years later, the Republican Party jams McPAIN down Our Throats!
McPAIN was an Instant Replay of the Doldrums Sleepy Hollow DOLE! Its a MIRACLE given to US by Sarah Palin that WE LOST by only 6%! a virtual tie with THE MESSIACAL ZERO!! WE SHOULD HAVE BEAT THE ZERO BY 30 percentage points!...:-)
May GOD BLESS ANN COULTER AND SARAH PALIN, TWO GREAT AMERICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great stuff as always.
I am so tired of liberals picking our candidates. From now on, if the New York Times likes one of our guys, he's OUT. The New York Times hates us - and we don't need their "concern" about our well being. It's all a lie.
I still have not figured out who bankrolled McCain’s primary campaign. Where did he get the money for the ads, organization and staffing to compete with Romney and Guiliani? He somehow overnight went from a bottom tier candidate to the frontrunner overnight.
An object lesson - that when Republicans embrace their conservative philosophy, without attempting to dilute or compromise important foundations of that conservatism, they win elections, because the American public responds. Only when Republicans attempt to STAY in office by adopting the coloration of their opponents, do they get booted and replaced with the “real thing” liberals, as there is no point in continuing to vote for the pale imitation.
No kidding, Obama ran to the RIGHT of McCain on the issue of “lower taxes” saying that “95%” would pay lower taxes when he is President, and the 5% on whom the additional taxes would be levied, would carry the water for the rest of us.
There are SO many ways to deconstruct that claim.
Bumping and Marking for FR's beloved Ann!
Once again, perfect analysis. I am still in utter amazement of what sore losers are the queers. I know I should not be surprised because emotional instability is one of the most obvious characteristics of homos but they are so damaging their cause by this giant temper tantrum they are throwing. When folks say those who voted yes on 8 are bigots I explain why they are absolutely wrong and list the reasons why this is not a civil rights issue, beyond the fact that a no on 8 victory would have stripped many of us of our First Amendment Rights. I have lost friends who have homo family members and just cannot accept the truth with the same ease in which they accept their children or siblings in their openly and shamelessly flaunting of perverted behavior.