Posted on 11/12/2008 11:12:02 AM PST by sickoflibs
My issue is liberals using the courts for anything they cant sell, along with public schools to brainwash kids. The califoria courts force this so the news media could see all the HAPPY people, and the little kids brainwashed. They use democracy as a tool to convince us we have a say, nothing else.
Florida passed an amendment that says marriage is between a man and a woman.
Only thing they’ve done right in an election for quite some time.
In said circumstances there is the pitcher and the catcher.
Olberfool is the catcher.
I didn’t know that the Olber-moron was queer!
I need to get Rush 24/7. The next two years will be wild and I remember 93-94, wish he had a TV show again.
maybe I should have added to what’s he is going to do now “And Still have an Audience” .
The Election itself drove Olbermaniac’s Ratings . . he is headed towards basement ratings (again)
“If marriage was not redefined years ago (BY PASSING LAWS KEITH!) the president’s parents couldn’t have married””
Oh, the president-*elect*. Olbermann is getting ahead of himself, isn’t he?
Oh, and I don’t think that laws in Hawaii (where Obama’s parents were married) ever banned inter-racial marriages.
Oh, and the wedding between Obama’s parents *did* violate the law, and still would vioplate the law, because Obama’s father was *already married* and bigamy is illegal in all 50 states. But I’m sure that Olbermann’s next crusade is to get judges to declare polygamy laws unconstitutional because “the human heart” sometimes wants to marry several different people.
What a maroon.
It is funny to hear people rail against the supporters of Prop 8 but retain a respectful distance from Obama who has come out, if you will, against (and for, I've heard) gay marriage. I think that is why gay marriage supporters want to rush it through, or overturn Prop 8 before he takes office, to avoid the obvious conflict.
All the more reason to keep any conflict alive, wag the dog style. Perhaps that's why he's been so vocal against Prop 8 - to build a loyal fan base (at least until they achieve their goal), keep him employed. We all need to work and eat. In theory, anyway.
How is it that this ‘right’ has only recently been discovered? How could societies and families have functioned for thousands of years, never having acknowledging or asserting this ‘right’ that has been there all along?
How can a judge order licenses be given out or order NJ elected to rewrite law? If marriage is unconstitutional it is, then throw it out. But they clearly make up law,
It’s gonna suck to be Olbie on Judgement Day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.