Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bamahead
I imgine this tin-horn sheriff wants to know ahead of time which gun owners would readily comply with a confiscation order as opposed to which ones wouldn't. I imagine that would correlates reasonably closely with the the ones likely to be difficult as the same ones who reply that they want their name secret.

It's all foresight toward your sheriff's allocation of the Civilian National Security Force (CNSF) assets. Volunteers go the ones who seemed not to care, SWAT team to the one who wanted to be kept secret

In telephonic marketing, some calls are made mechanically, only to record that a human has picked up at such-and-such hour of the day. So-and-so never picked up the phone at 4pm after 40 calls over 5 months. Hmmm. Thieves might find that kind of information interesting; so would CNSF "volunteers" with blanket search warrants of all CCW and FOID card holders.

Click WHATEVER to unsubscribe. Get there, type in your email address, and blammo, even more emails from the very same outfit! Now that they have confirmation you're one to read the fine print on junk email, are they ever interested in you, bub!

HF

23 posted on 11/12/2008 9:40:55 AM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: holden

Those of us who tend to read the fine print also have telephones that announce who is calling before we lift the receiver. I hope they don’t think the blanket search warrants gives them permission to walk in without knocking. A simple mistake such as that could result in needing to be carried out.


32 posted on 11/12/2008 10:00:07 AM PST by B4Ranch (("In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." FDR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson