To: andy58-in-nh
I agree,, and im stunned to find myself thinking Clinton was at least not a full on revolutionary. This current crowd is different somehow.
43 posted on
11/12/2008 9:53:17 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
To: DesertRhino
Obama is surrounding himself with a lot of Clintonites, which might cause him to trust their experience and restrain his more radical impulses. Except that what restrained them in the past were Clinton himself (the Great Triangulator) and the political backdrop of the 1990s, in which conservatives were still influential players in Washington.
Clinton is now out of the picture, while George Bush and Republicans in Congress have pretty much cured the "problem" of any residual conservative influence. But Obama himself is the bigger concern - he is very different from Clinton. I do not believe he is as interested (as Bill was) in the trappings of power as he is interested in the exercise of power.
52 posted on
11/12/2008 10:09:30 AM PST by
andy58-in-nh
(Liberty has few friends, many enemies, and no adequate substitute.)
To: DesertRhino
But the toon was very much their elder brother and wayshower.
68 posted on
11/12/2008 10:32:11 AM PST by
ichabod1
(You won't know obammunism is here until it puts a boot in your (fat) bottom.)
To: DesertRhino
This crowd was trained in secular colleges by the likes of many Ayers & Dohrn professors from radical SDS, which had 100,000 member in 1968 and decided to become educators...they determined the future working class of America would be college educated...see how it worked.
119 posted on
11/12/2008 3:30:54 PM PST by
Kackikat
(.It's NOT over until it's over and it's NOT over yet....The Trumpet will sound....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson