Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe
How do you come by that one?

It's right in the article -- the 2008 share of the "women's vote" dropped off 4% from the 2004 share of the "women's vote".

48 posted on 11/12/2008 7:14:38 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
It's right in the article — the 2008 share of the “women's vote” dropped off 4% from the 2004 share of the “women's vote””

You are still missing the point.
McCain had a low share of the women's vote in polls BEFORE he nominated Gov Palin.
Gov Plain pushed his overall poll numbers UP above Hussein's, only for McCain ti drive his numbers back down again, with his erractoc performance when the markets crashed.

60 posted on 11/12/2008 7:24:30 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
You're comparing Bush to McCain, and projecting Sarah as the one to blame. The base never liked McCain, but thousands showed up at every rally to see Sarah.
62 posted on 11/12/2008 7:26:29 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson