Don’t use the word ‘sure’ ... if the challenges are dismissed on ‘no standing to challenge’ then there will be no standing upon which to challenge the illiegitimate president or any of his illicit activities such as falsely swearing or violation of oaths. The Constitution means nothing to Barack Obama. Get ready for power to be exhibited in all the rawest ways.
My point is this. Berg’s suit got dismissed because he didn’t meet one of the standard tests for who has standing. His injury was too vague and tenuous, etc. When Obama signs a tax increase into law, for example, that is no longer going to be a problem. Millions of people will have been very clearly damaged by an act of dubious constitutionality because Obama is ineligible to sign it.
>>> if the challenges are dismissed on ‘no standing to challenge’ then there will be no standing upon which to challenge the illiegitimate president or any of his illicit activities such as falsely swearing or violation of oaths. The Constitution means nothing to Barack Obama. Get ready for power to be exhibited in all the rawest ways.<<<
Bears repeating.