And so, their solution is to endorse nonreligion over religion?
Option A: religion over nonreligion
Option B: nonreligion over religion
Option C: equal treatment of both
Option D: neutrality with respect to both
The preference is for the Constitutional treatment: A combination of D and C with D taking precedence by default and C being accommodated when neutrality is infeasible. And of course private expressions in private activities remain unrestricted.