Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deja Vu All Over Again: Blogger Again Finds Error in NASA Climate Data [Sept data used for October]
DailyTech ^ | November 11, 2008 | Michael Asher

Posted on 11/11/2008 1:28:26 PM PST by Mike Fieschko


GISS's October Data. The large reddish-brown area in Russia is actually September readings.

Amateur team finds NASA error similar to one they discovered a year ago.

NASA'S Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) is one of the world's primary sources for climate data. GISS issues regular updates on world temperatures based on their analysis of temperature readings from thousands of monitoring stations over the globe. GISS' most recent data release originally reported last October as being extraordinarily warm-- a full 0.78C above normal. This would have made it the warmest October on record; a huge increase over the previous month's data.Those results set off alarm bells with Steve McIntyre and his gang of Baker Street irregulars at Climateaudit.org. They noted that NASA's data didn't agree at all with the satellite temperature record, which showed October to be very mild, continuing the same trend of slight cooling that has persisted since 1998. So they dug a little deeper.

McKintyre, the same man who found errors last year in GISS's US temperature record, quickly noted that most of the temperature increase was coming from Russia. A chart of world temperatures showed that in October, most of Russia, the largest nation on Earth, was not only registering hot, but literally off the scale. Yet anecdotal reports were suggesting that October was actually slightly colder than normal. Could there be another error in GISS's data?

An alert reader on McKintyre's blog revealed that there was a very large problem. Looking at the actual readings from individual stations in Russia showed a curious anomaly. The locations had all been assigned the exact temperatures from a month earlier-- the much warmer month of September. Russia cools very rapidly in the fall months, so recycling the data from the earlier month had led to a massive temperature increase.

A few locations in Ireland were also found to be using September data.

Steve McKintyre informed GISS of the error by email. According to McKintyre, there was no response, but within "about an hour", GISS pulled down the erroneous data, citing a "mishap" and pointing the finger of blame upstream to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration (NOAA).

NOAA's Deputy Director of Communications, Scott Smullens, tells DailyTech that NOAA is responsible only for temperature readings in the US, not those in other nations.

The error not only affected October data, but due to the complex algorithm GISS uses to convert actual temperature readings into their output results, altered the previously published values for several other months as well. The values for August 2008, for instance, changed by 0.11C and the global anomaly as far back as 2005 increased by a hundredth of a degree.

GISS is run by Dr. James Hansen, a strident global warming advocate who has accused oil companies of "crimes against humanity".  Hansen recently made headlines when he travelled to London to testify on behalf of a group of environmentalists who had damaged a coal plant in protest against global warming. Hansen also serves as science advisor to Al Gore.

Dr. Hansen could not be reached for comment.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blogger; climatechange; globalclimatechange; globalhoaxing; nasa; smartblogger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2008 1:28:26 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

No error. It was a purposeful deceit.


2 posted on 11/11/2008 1:29:52 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Funny, I don’t recall seeing any errors in the global cooling direction. Curious. It’ not unlike our voting recounts...only the Democrat candidate ever comes up with “new” votes.


3 posted on 11/11/2008 1:34:23 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

They never seem to make errors in data crunching that show temperatures to be colder.

Wonder why?


4 posted on 11/11/2008 1:35:40 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

In face of increasing scientific evidence that global cooling is now occurring, the global warming apologists will do anything to bolster their theory including altering the data to fit...its been going on that way since the famous “hockey stick” graph, the holy grail of global warming cultists, was shown to be a deliberate distortion of the facts.


5 posted on 11/11/2008 1:35:48 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Doesn’t NASA believe in telling the truth anymore?

Dr. Hanson should be imprisoned for fraud.


6 posted on 11/11/2008 1:37:43 PM PST by Doug4McCain (I'm ashamed of myself for supporting McCain, but I still love Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Dr. Hansen could not be reached for comment.

His likely comment? "Curses, foiled again!"

7 posted on 11/11/2008 1:38:03 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

If possible, even if using incomplete real data, if someone could redo the colors on the map, to the correct colors, to have a contrast with the erroneous map, it would be striking.


8 posted on 11/11/2008 1:41:55 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

“And I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn’t for you meddling kids...”

Zoynks!


9 posted on 11/11/2008 1:42:13 PM PST by BigMacGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doug4McCain

It’s the October Surprise.


10 posted on 11/11/2008 1:43:30 PM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Jeez. No wonder it was so hot.


11 posted on 11/11/2008 1:46:25 PM PST by auboy (Men who cannot deceive others are very often successful at deceiving themselves. Samuel Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

You will never see this on network news. Never!


12 posted on 11/11/2008 1:50:08 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

September data used for October. That’s just daylight savings time 2.0.


13 posted on 11/11/2008 1:51:08 PM PST by weegee (Global Warming Change? Fight Global Socialist CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
They never seem to make errors in data crunching that show temperatures to be colder. Wonder why?

I think its some sort of underlying immutable law, like the one which forces all vote recount adjustments to favor the Democratic candidate.

14 posted on 11/11/2008 1:54:03 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doug4McCain

“Doesn’t NASA believe in telling the truth anymore?”

NASA believes in getting government funding and anything with global warming attached to it gets big bucks!


15 posted on 11/11/2008 1:54:06 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Yup. I’ve never seen a recount move in the GOP direction.


16 posted on 11/11/2008 1:55:41 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant; steelyourfaith; Reform Canada; neverdem; sionnsar; MHGinTN; AFPhys

The error “might” have been a legitimate error - Hansen is so rigid and politically motivated with all other data and statements that form the parts of his zealous “mission to convert the earth” that he would NOT be checking himself or expecting an error when/if he (or his underlings) makes a mistake that shows temperatures are HOTTER.

(Note that if the mistake had shown a negative or lower temperature, Hansen would have been all over it immediately.)

However .... This DOES demonstrate that Hansen’s basic, fundamental “scientific methods and practices” as head of GISS is fatally flawed and politically motivated.


17 posted on 11/11/2008 2:35:08 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
No error. It was a purposeful deceit.

It really looks that way. And it's on the basis of such "data" that our entire economy will be restructured.

18 posted on 11/11/2008 2:44:14 PM PST by denydenydeny (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; steelyourfaith; sionnsar; kempo

Watts Up With That” - and several other AGW websites are reporting that many stations in Denmark AND England are duplicated as well.

It is NOT just Russian stations that were falsified in Hansen’s GISS report for October.


19 posted on 11/11/2008 2:52:29 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
GISS is run by Dr. James Hansen, a strident global warming advocate who has accused oil companies of "crimes against humanity". Hansen recently made headlines when he travelled to London to testify on behalf of a group of environmentalists who had damaged a coal plant in protest against global warming. Hansen also serves as science advisor to Al Gore.

What an innovative idea! You use actual data, but slip it a month or two to get the desired result! This is very embarrassing to NASA I would think. Hansen already has a reputation for bias. Given that Dr. Hansen has a vested interest in man-made global warming, you would think that his organization would error in the opposite direction once in a while. But then again Hansen supports a hoax and an insane man, Al Gore, IMO.

Could it be "birds of a feather?"

It is not possible for our incoming administration to make sure that climate scientists supporting the hoax are not paid to prove global warming is caused by man and not the Sun. Indeed having a vested interest in man caused global warming is a requisite to speak authoritatively on the subject. It is nothing more that idolatry.

20 posted on 11/11/2008 3:03:20 PM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson