Skip to comments.
Excerpts from Sarah Palin's Interview With Fox News
Time ^
Posted on 11/10/2008 6:04:22 PM PST by mathwhizz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 last
To: Kurt Evans
I think it unlikely that she meant to say:
Maybe it wasn't written in the script, but so what. Jesus! If this is all going to be so scripted and kind of like a movie screen and we have to follow verbatim everything that somebody writes for you, I don't want any part of that. That's not who I am and that's not who John McCain is either.
But if she had said this, I would not have minded.
181
posted on
11/11/2008 5:47:06 PM PST
by
ChessExpert
(Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas that is necessary for life on earth.)
To: Kurt Evans
Does it really matter?
With all the issues, claims, counterclaims, etc. of the last eight years, you want to lecture on the pronunciation of nuclear?
182
posted on
11/11/2008 5:53:38 PM PST
by
ChessExpert
(Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas that is necessary for life on earth.)
To: Kurt Evans
Thanks but I’ll ping to 126 thank you.
183
posted on
11/11/2008 7:56:51 PM PST
by
pacpam
(action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
To: Kurt Evans
Matthew 23:24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
184
posted on
11/11/2008 8:36:07 PM PST
by
Snurple
(VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
To: Kurt Evans
but "golly" and "gosh" are clearly derivatives of God's name
"god" is not God's name; therefore, "golly" and "gosh" are not derivatives of it.
185
posted on
11/11/2008 8:41:07 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: aruanan; Kurt Evans
"god" is not God's name; therefore, "golly" and "gosh" are not derivatives of it.Right you are. In Hebrew...JEHOVAH JEHOVAH-JIREH, JEHOVAH-ROPHE, JEHOVAH-NISSI, JEHOVAH-M'KADDESH ect or in Greek... KURIOS, DESPOTES, THEOS, HUPSISTOS ect. The guy is splitting hairs, he doesn't like Palin so he wants to justify his dislike with this lame argument.
186
posted on
11/11/2008 8:51:34 PM PST
by
Snurple
(VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
To: Kurt Evans
“I’d vote for a woman for president if I believed she was the best candidate on the ballot, but to me Sarah seems overconfident, and her priorities seem disordered.”
dude....if yer a conservative, of course Sarah would be the best candidate on the ballot....she was on this last one...so she seems overconfident? what? she wasnt sufficiently supplicant to the men-folk? would you rather she looked at the ground when men were in the room? and exactly what priorities of hers are disordered?
face it kurt....the best conservative to come out of the republican party in many years just happens to be a woman and you cant bet behind her....check yourself, misogyny man
bagster
sarah 2012
p.s. what exactly does “taking something in vain” mean, anyway....ive never quite got that....preach on, kurt
187
posted on
11/11/2008 10:57:56 PM PST
by
bagster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson