The bigger, more important question is this:
Was “information” from the “Marty Eisenstadt” the main source of Carl Cameron’s story as well??
IF this hoaxer is the one that put Cameron onto the “story” in the first place, then Cameron easily could have gotten 2-3 lukewarm non-specific “confirmations” ala “yeah, we RINOs never did like Sarah Palin” etc.
IOW, we must force Cameron and Fox News to come clean: did they ever have a real story at all or was this hoax b.s. the entire story?
They’ll never come clean. But if Carl disappears or is demoted, soon, I’ll take that as a confession.
If Cameron actually fell for a hoax; then he needs to go down hard. With all the enthusium he showed while reporting it, he needs to come clean or quit.