Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kesg

That’s why we used to call them the Party of One.

You know, there’s one person in the Party-—you. That way you always agree 100% with your party. And if you get the nomination, which you will since there’s only one person in the party, then you always agree 100% with your nominee. Perfect!

It won’t be long before these people “discover” that their current hero, Palin, isn’t conservative enough for them either and they start searching for some other Barr-like political nematode upon which to take their Glorious and Highly Principled Stand.

Which then results in the country going further and deeper and faster down the toilet than it would have had they taken the-—in their view-—highly unprincipled stand of those who would rather vote for a RINO (or whoever) to try to defeat a Marxist than to stand by and do nothing whatsoever.


90 posted on 11/10/2008 1:39:04 PM PST by fightinJAG (Who needs the Fairness Doctrine? Obama admits the power to tax is the power to destroy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG

I don’t have the words to describe how strongly and absolutely I agree with you. Yes, we need to recruit and nominate prinicpled conservatives, but the reason is PRECISELY because they have a better chance of winning than RINOs. Losertarians are losertarians precisely because they don’t care about winning elections, only about not voting for someone with whom they don’t agree 100% or thereabouts. They then go around being perpetually miserable and insufferable regarding the national political situation. They remind me of Philadelphia Flyers fans. Not good.


133 posted on 11/10/2008 2:22:04 PM PST by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson