Replies

Comparably, Hillary would NOT be as bad as the Obamessih but we were so hung up on her, he was able to slide in under the radar.

This is where I disagree with you. Zero has absolutely no experience actually governing, unless you consider running a political campaign as some sort of management. Hillary would be far more effective at getting things passed.

Her proposals would also be far more likely to be more 'mainstream', insuring that they'd not be opposed by as many Americans as would Barry's far left socialism. At some point, the novelty of having a black President is going to wear off with the American public, and even with the lamestream media. He's going to be expected to deliver pie, and if he cannot, they'll turn sour on him.

Her proposals would also be far more likely to be more 'mainstream', insuring that they'd not be opposed by as many Americans as would Barry's far left socialism.

So, you actually DO agree with me. THAT's the point I was trying to make. Between the two of them, NEITHER has any real experience governing (or, to use Obama's term as of this morning, "ruling"), but Hillary doesn't approach the Obamessiah's radicalism, which would have made her the safer choice.

At some point, the novelty of having a black President is going to wear off with the American public, and even with the lamestream media. He's going to be expected to deliver pie, and if he cannot, they'll turn sour on him.

On tTHIS point, we are in complete agreement. He has overpromised and will have no choice but to underdeliver. That's what makes (IMO) the mid-terms in '10 ours to lose.