Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

As I read the article, there is no government money involved. The banks want to forgive up to 40 percent of the debt in an effort to recoup the other 60 percent rather than lose 100 percent because the person can’t pay. While this may initially sound like deadbeats getting another break, we need to consider the practices of the credit card companies.

Many of these people borrowed relatively small amounts but were charged interest rates and various fees at a rate a self-respecting loanshark would have been reluctant to charge 20 years ago. It is not unusual that a person who had a four to five thousand dollar debt saw his interest rate double or triple and incurred fees greater than the original interest. Many of the people have paid more actual dollars than they originally borrowed but still have a balance greater than the original loan. The predatory practices of the credit card issuers do not warrant sympathy.

Making a decent profit is absolutely necessary to remain in business but gouging people just because you have the power to do so is not free enterprise at it’s best. I normally think everyone should meet his or her obligations but when I encounter a skunk and a porcupine involved in a pissing match I normally don’t pick a favorite.


58 posted on 11/09/2008 8:55:20 PM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: etcb

I hope what you say is true. But I smell another bailout.


59 posted on 11/09/2008 8:56:19 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson