Posted on 11/09/2008 3:41:29 PM PST by Libloather
401(k) early casualty of downturn
Recession would jeopardize match made by employers
DAVID PITT Associated Press
Published: November 9, 2008 6:00 a.m.
DES MOINES, Iowa Retirement accounts already battered by a steep market decline might get hit again as several companies suspend or reduce their 401(k) match to save cash.
**SNIP**
Matching contributions average about 11 percent of a companys profits, according to a recent survey of more than 1,000 companies by the Profit Sharing/401k Council of America.
**SNIP**
This is a recession-type of response. These employers are really up against it and they have to decide to cut somewhere and this seems like the least bad place for them to cut, said Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
**SNIP**
Jamie Bloomquist, 40, works for Maine Boats, Homes & Harbors, Inc., of Camden, Maine. Even with just eight full-time employees, he enjoys a 3 percent match on his account.
It seems to me that would not be the best place to start cutting because it does say something about their commitment to their workforce and their commitment to you as an employee, he said.
For workers who lose the company match, its essentially a pay cut, said Tom Stritikus, 38, of Seattle, who gets a match of 7.5 percent from his employer.
People get enraged (when) they dont get cost-of-living adjustment for one or two years, said Stritikus, an associate dean at the University of Washington. But to think about taking an actual cut to your salary is quite a daunting proposition.
**SNIP**
Schwab, which manages company-sponsored retirement plans covering 1.3 million workers, said it hasnt heard of any clients planning to suspend or reduce their match in the current climate.
(Excerpt) Read more at journalgazette.net ...
Do not lose your behind just because of an election...
Anyone know of any good mattress sales going on right about now????
/sarc
I still have mine. Care to add to the pile?
Mark
There will have to be decisions made as to weather employees are cut or the 401K contributions will be cut.
If companies cut employees, lets hope they are Obama voters.
Let’s be careful of jumping to conclusions. As revenue plummets, corporations are worried about getting business done and meeting payroll. Access to cash is very difficult in this environment. The goal is to survive this downturn with your core business in tact. The harsh reality is that difficult choices will have to be made. If cuts in employee 401k matching funds are coupled with cuts in executive bonuses and other perks, then we may rightly conclude that all the cuts were necessary for survival.
This is a test:
Assume you are in charge of maximizing the companies short term profits choose from the following responses;
What does your “3% is cool” comment mean?
The Democrat Party is proposing the federal governmetn TAKE ALL the 401(k) retirement accounts and in return guarantee a mere 3% return.
IOW DE-privatize retirement accounts.
ONLY the government allowed to provide retirement accounts.
The largest power grabe of private property.
Essentially this is doing to 401k accounts what unions did to pension funds.
We don't even really need to post the articles themselves anymore - just a link, and we can go on to write an editorial about the REAL purpose of the New Government Media article.
I did one earlier today:
Todd Lewan (AP): Historians, Too, Call Obama Victory 'Monumental'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.