Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libbylu
I am stunned to. Most Freepers had looked at Sarah’s record before she was ever nominated. So what did McCain say that was wrong? Really would like to know.

Your post seems garbled. But let me take a crack at it. I already said some of this before.

The campaign said Sarah was a tax cutter--Sarah raised taxes.

The campaign said Sarah was a spending cutter--Sarah raised spending.

The campaign said she didn't do earmarks--she did.

They said she was ethical--there was an investigation going against her (and despite what you think, she still isn't exonerated.)

and on and on and on. Freepers didn't look at her record. They looked at the promotional stuff put out by some kid in Colorado. When McCain tapped her, jaws dropped here--and I mean Republican jaws. Sure, most of them swung into line . . . even the ones who had been critical of her failure to work with our side. I guess she was just doing that "across the isle" stuff that McCain touts.

98 posted on 11/09/2008 5:15:21 PM PST by Stunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Stunned
Well said!

Sarah Palin is little more than Mike Huckabee in a skirt.

The way the rednecks are trying to take over our party I find very disturbing.

102 posted on 11/09/2008 9:52:53 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson