Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer
I guess I can't be too surprised at the reactions here. I was one of the few arguing that the nannie govt shouldn't be deciding who gets to call you or not.

Stopping property crimes is one of the few legitimate functions of government. It is perfectly appropriate for the state, at my request, to prevent strangers from trespassing on my phone.

44 posted on 11/07/2008 11:06:30 PM PST by Sloth (What's the difference between taxation and armed robbery, aside from who's doing it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth
Stopping property crimes is one of the few legitimate functions of government. It is perfectly appropriate for the state, at my request, to prevent strangers from trespassing on my phone.

The equivalent crime is someone on the street yelling at you in your yard. They have not gone on your property, but sent sound in your direction, or in the case of your phone, electrical current representing sound. If you can make a case that the person in the street is disturbing the peace and you should call the sheriff, then fine. But it's not trespass.

50 posted on 11/09/2008 6:15:44 AM PST by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson