Posted on 11/07/2008 8:20:19 AM PST by AndrewWalden
Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God
Good one.
What ever happened to Grannys funeral. She died election eve?
No funeral, wake, mention at all? Maybe I missed it but it don’t say much for him or Michelle.
Uh. No. Privacy laws and laws passed in response to identity theft prevent just any old munchkin from seeing your records.
Here you go:
http://comments.obamacrimes.com/blog/_trackback/3962509
Justice Souter denies injunction for stay of predidential election
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed response due December 1, 2008
The writ of certiorari and the injunction to stay the election were two separate filings. Justice Souter denied the injunction. The writ is the method by which a case is brought to the Supreme Court. It is sort of like filing a lawsuit at the District Court level, but it is totally up to the Supreme Court’s discretion to approve or deny the writ. The Supreme Court is not required to even give a hearing for any lawsuit, or at least the vast majority, appealed to the Supreme Court. Once the writ is approved, then a hearing date is scheduled. But, if it is denied, then it is over, the lawsuit is dead in the water. The Supreme Court receives thousands of writs a year, and only approves around 100 or so of them. For fairness, before a writ is approved or denied, both sides of the case are allowed to present their case as to why it should be approved or denied. Obama needs to respond by December 1, 2008. Of course, if I were Obama, I would put off responding until the last minute. This is a lot like where both sides of a case are allowed to respond to a lawsuit filed at the District Court level, like we saw in the original filing of the lawsuit. The defendent has a certain period of time where they are required to file a response. Also, the plaintiff of this case can then respond to the defendent’s response. It is very likely that it may be the end of December or early January before the Court makes a decision on the writ, unless the process is accelerated.
The term "African-American" was unheard of in the early 60's. I didn't start hearing the term until the early 89's.
It's has a lot in common with Dan Rather's phony National Guard papers that were produced using current technology as opposed to what was actually available at that time.
For me, BO and DNC reaction to Phil Berg’s lawsuit is the red flag. Maybe during the campaign, refusing to produce the BC is a political trap for McCain if he raises the issue and prove it wrong. The elections are over and BO has nothing to gain by not producing it. So on 1 Dec 2008, the Supreme Court has asked BO and DNC to respond to Phil Berg’s suit (it made it to Justice Souter who refuse to delay the elections but demand for a response) will be the first clue. If BO and DNC produces the BC, case over, but if BO and DNC counters with a legal response to dismiss the case, RED FLAG everyone.
Some Nigerian scam artist?
DAY-AM!!!!!
Because Hawaii doesn't allow it?
So, The Messiah just lays down the law, and we bow down and worship him?
I think not. It is obvious to the dullest eye that he has a problem with his birth certificate, or he would have released it. And his college records. And his medical records.
I don’t know if he was born in Kenya, or if his real father was Frank the Commie, or maybe Malcolm X, but the questions won’t go away because he tells us to shut up, or sends his proxies out to do the job.
And that still doesn’t resolve the problem that he was adopted, had his name changed to Barry Soetoro, became an Indonesian citizen, and gave up his American citizenship. None of that matters, either? Even though there’s a written record from his old school in Indonesia?
Because it was produced recently (by Hawaii). It has never been (seriously) claimed to be the original or a photocopy or scan of the original.
Look on the bright side. Since he never legally changed his name, we elected no one President.
A reasonable answer is nothing since that would mean the official reproductions would have to be false. Why would officials in Hawaii put out a false official reproduction? Because Obama told them to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.