Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
Possibly Bingo there. You may be onto something. Here is a possible reason. Spitzer was a superdelegate and the superdelegates had been considering going with Hillary over Obama at the time the Spitzer scandal broke. The timing of the Spitzer scandal's emergence looked non-conincidental.

Now as you point out the timing of the non-prosecution announcement also looks non-coincidental.

Originally had wondered whether it was showing that Hillary would blackmail superdelegates with FBI files.

Could this scandal's emergence and the tossing of prosecution however have been actually arranged somehow by backers of Obama? Wouldn't have thought it. The timing of the emergence and the announcement of no prosecution however certainly both appear to be non-coincidental. I don't know enough to know the reason behind these apparent non-coincidences though. Looks suspicious and probably is.

37 posted on 11/07/2008 4:52:40 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom of Speech Wins

“Originally had wondered whether it was showing that Hillary would blackmail superdelegates with FBI files.”

My thought was more along the lines of a gop-run doj taking pre-emptive action (whether their initial finding on him was targeted or just lucky, dunno) to end this thug’s career before he got a presidential run going down the road. He is the worst kind of pol, overtly subverting the system, extorting people and businesses, to build his own political power base.


49 posted on 11/07/2008 7:14:53 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson