Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Gays” Call for Violence Against Christian Supporters of Prop 8
Canada Free Press ^ | 5 November 2008 | Matt Barber

Posted on 11/06/2008 10:33:31 AM PST by DestinyEagle

In a stunning reaction to the passage of state constitutional marriage protection amendments in California, Arizona and Florida, several self identified homosexuals on a number of homosexual blogs are advocating violence against Christians and other supporters of traditional marriage. Additionally, some homosexuals are calling for church burnings in response to yesterday’s three state referenda in defense of natural marriage.

In a blog entry titled “You’ll Want to Punch them” on Queerty.com, poster “BillyBob Thornton” wrote, “… I have never considered being a violent radical extremist for our Equal Rights, But now I think maybe I should consider becoming one.” “Stenar” asked, “Can someone in CA please go burn down the Mormon temples there, PLEASE. I mean seriously. DO IT.” “Angelo Ventura,” said, “… hope they all rot in hell, those servants of a lying, corrupt devil!

BAN RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM!” And, “Jonathan,” warned, “I’m going to give them something to be f – ing scared of. … I’m a radical who is now on a mission to make them all pay for what they’ve done.”

Meanwhile, over at JoeMyGod.blogspot.com, “World O Jeff,” said, “Burn their f–ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers.” While, “Tread,” wrote, “I hope the No on 8 people have a long list and long knives.” “Joe,” stated, “I swear, I’d murder people with my bare hands this morning.”

And on the Americablog.com Web site, “scottinsf” posted, “Trust me. I’ve got a big list of names of mormons and catholics that were big supporters of Prop 8. … As far as mormons and catholics ... I warn them to watch their backs.”

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: aids; churchburnings; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; immorality; prop8; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last
To: Vaquero
"will they hit me with their purth?"

No; but your house will be redecorated against your will.

121 posted on 11/09/2008 5:40:55 AM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Some of these guys are truly vicious

And gals (or whatever). We had a gay bar in our 'hood. Started as a C&W bar but went gay somewhere along the line. The neighborhood hated it because of the violence in the parking lot and surrounding alley ways every freaking weekend.

They finally got it closed down - a local Salvadoran restaurant that was being displaced by road construction bought it. It seems to be a family place now, haven't tried it yet.

122 posted on 11/09/2008 5:55:24 AM PST by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow

Most people mistakenly believe that flamers are “wussies”. They aren’t.If this escalates, there will be some surprises for most of the population. Let’s hope it’s eye opening and attitude changing.


123 posted on 11/09/2008 6:17:17 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

they sort of prove their own lack of value to the future of society via their own conduct.

I think this stems from the fact that the arguments PRESENTLY in front of the Calif. SC were done BEFORE the issue went to the voters.

They are counting on the notion the Judges were hoping NOT to have to kick out the referendum and have the voters validate their fiat imposing homosexual marriage on the state. (see the voters agree with the court)

Now the people have rejected the court opinion. TWICE. what will the court do? what will it mean to the courts if they now overide the people TWICE.

They can only set aside via PROCEDURE not constitutionality.

Of course the conduct of the homosexuals in response only diminishes their effort to “normalize” their sexual conduct.


124 posted on 11/09/2008 6:53:38 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: verity
No; but your house will be redecorated against your will

well NO..not my house. Not if I am home. just see my Tagline.

Molon Labe.

125 posted on 11/09/2008 8:53:35 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
California was supposed to be an easy path to the 9th circuit court of appeals for full faith and credit on the rest of the states.
What is stopping them from doing so with the "marriages" in Massachussetts?
126 posted on 11/09/2008 9:39:09 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson