Whether you like it or not!
1 posted on
11/05/2008 4:33:47 PM PST by
SmithL
To: SmithL
are they jarred or fisted over this?
2 posted on
11/05/2008 4:34:35 PM PST by
MAD-AS-HELL
(How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
To: SmithL
Got out the vote didn’t ya?
3 posted on
11/05/2008 4:34:35 PM PST by
autumnraine
(Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
To: SmithL
It passed despite Jerry Brown's underhanded tactic of renaming the proposition to make it sound less appealing to the uninformed voter.
Another bright spot in California was the victory by Duncan D. Hunter, USMC, in San Diego County.
To: SmithL
I’ll never understand why these people are shocked when Americans tell them that they’d like to keep the same definition of marriage that has existed for millenia.
To: SmithL
"There's something deeply wrong with putting the rights of a minority up to a majority vote," said Evan Wolfson, a gay-rights lawyer who heads a group called Freedom to Marry. "If this were being done to almost any other minority, people would see how un-American this is."Bigamists and members of NAMBLA could make the same argument as this guy.
6 posted on
11/05/2008 4:40:09 PM PST by
Azzurri
To: SmithL
"If this were being done to almost any other minority, people would see how un-American this is." Tell it to the polygamists!
7 posted on
11/05/2008 4:40:46 PM PST by
Argus
(Stuff Compassionate and Maverick - just try plain old CONSERVATISM again)
To: SmithL
Why are homosexuals categorized as a separate minority group?
Just more absurdity.
8 posted on
11/05/2008 4:43:09 PM PST by
Boiling Pots
(Barack Obama is not your hip black friend)
To: SmithL
Obama had a nuanced position on the issue, saying he opposes gay marriage while also speaking out against Proposition 8.
In other words, he lied. Claiming to support marriage in order to dupe moderates while opposing laws to protect marriage. Let's hope his tax policy doesn't suffer from the same "nuance"!
I'm elated that Prop 8 passed, but the exit polling is dire, showing a generational shift that will probably usher in the approve of homosexual "marriage" within a decade.
11 posted on
11/05/2008 4:46:18 PM PST by
UncleDick
(Sola fide)
To: SmithL
They still have Massachusetts!
To: SmithL
California voters put a stop to gay marriage, creating uncertainty about the legal status of 18,000 same-sex couples who tied the knot during a four-month window of opportunity opened by the state's highest court.Uncertainty? As the power vests in the state, by definition they created certainty.
To: SmithL
"There's something deeply wrong with putting the rights of a minority up to a majority vote," said Evan Wolfson, a gay-rights lawyer who heads a group called Freedom to Marry. "If this were being done to almost any other minority, people would see how un-American this is."Amazing, considering the majority just voted to give themselves more benefits - at the expense of the minority.
Shall we have a discussion about who produces and pays the taxes in this country.
Newsflash: Production doesn't just mean turning a screw. Production is the end result of a creative mind. Take away the creative mind and what will the "workers" of this country have to produce.
I'm gonna step out on a limb, but I'm guessing the thinkers - the real producers of this country are a miniority.
21 posted on
11/05/2008 5:33:28 PM PST by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: SmithL
In a heartbreaking defeat for the gay-rights movement'Heartbreaking,' eh? No bias there, no siree. /s
22 posted on
11/05/2008 5:35:31 PM PST by
shhrubbery!
(Obama: The Only Senator Who Voted Against Stopping Infanticide)
To: SmithL; calcowgirl; ElkGroveDan; SierraWasp; doug from upland; kellynla
25 posted on
11/16/2008 5:33:42 PM PST by
Clintonfatigued
(If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson