I read it, he seems to imply that he hasn’t completely made up his mind, but wants to proceed on the idea that if we don’t engage, the left will control the agenda. This goes back to what I posted earlier-either way, it’s still a back door to expanding government, but if we don’t engage, it leaves the field wide open for the left who whole-heartedly endorse bigger government. How do we resolve this? I don’t see helping them reach the same goal, only at a slower speed, as very helpful.