Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; Norman Bates

Matt Blunt shouldn’t have turned tail and run, bad show. I hope he doesn’t plan on seeking office in the future because cowardice shouldn’t be rewarded. We still have our 5-4 majority in the House, and Nixon will be stymied by the GOP legislature (most especially that the MO GOP gained 3 seats in the State Senate, as we did in TN). One nice thing is that McCaskill revealed her moonbat leanings and so tied herself to the totalitarian, and with his narrowly losing the state, I can say she will probably be toast in 2012 for a second Senate term.


69 posted on 11/06/2008 10:25:39 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; Norman Bates; PhiKapMom

“Matt Blunt shouldn’t have turned tail and run, bad show.”

Perhaps. But the main reason that Matt Blunt didn’t run was that he was unpopular and would have likely lost. Indeed, he might not have even survived a Republican primary. Perhaps he thought that another Republican would have been a stronger candidate.

You are right that Blunt shouldn’t seek office in the future, for the same reason Democrats don’t want Bob Holden to run for anything.


72 posted on 11/06/2008 2:14:28 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson