Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paudio

Um, yeah, try selecting an even more liberal main nominee next time and see where that gets you. McCain was the most moderate of the choices for pete’s sake!

You do realize that if McCain hadn’t selected Palin as a running mate that he would have lost by even greater numbers. Palin drew thousands.

Obama won because we’re in an unpopular war and experiencing weak economic conditions. And yes, people tied McCain to Bush.

Oh, and the people who defected were elitist republicans who care more about what the world think of us than what is right with America. Douglas Kmiec, Chris Buckley, and the rest can kiss my ass.


18 posted on 11/04/2008 10:27:08 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NinoFan
Yes, I agree 100% that without Palin, McCain perhaps would have lost by 30pts. But my point is this: Republican needs to be a 'big tent' where different kind of conservatives can be united again. There are two possibilities to unite them: conservative idea that encompasses various factions, or strong leader who can bring people together despite their various views of conservatism.

The trend that concerns me is that various faction really started to point finger to each others, and accuse the other one of being 'impure'.

49 posted on 11/04/2008 10:39:44 PM PST by paudio (Nobody cried racism when Ken Blackwell, Lynn Swann, and Michael Steele lost to White guys...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson