Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does the Republican Party Need to be a Big-Tent Party Again?
Self | 10/4/08 | Self

Posted on 11/04/2008 10:20:52 PM PST by paudio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last
To: NavVet
We just ran the candidate whose whole campaign indeed career was an effort to reach out to moderates and independents and we got our clocks cleaned

But he didn't really reach out to the other conservative factions until the election.

141 posted on 11/04/2008 11:48:58 PM PST by paudio (Nobody cried racism when Ken Blackwell, Lynn Swann, and Michael Steele lost to White guys...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: GOPbabe

“The GOP and GWB have kept our borders open which is changing the composition of our electorate. “

That is so obvious, and yet the Stupid Party will never learn. Dubya’s true legacy will be the replacement of the American people by the 3rd world.


142 posted on 11/04/2008 11:49:31 PM PST by Pelham (Obama: Reconstruction version 2.0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Republicans were swept to majority power under promises to sharply reduce the power of centralized governement including the Contract with America. They explictly promised term limits, welfare reform, balancing the budget, auditing congressional laws to eliminate waste and objectively measure the compliance costs of the laws they passed, tort reform to remove out-of-control lawsuit. I seem to remember discussion of eliminating the Department of Education as well.

OK, the Republicans did pass welfare reform. But how many of these winning issues were just silently neglected after the election was over? When the Republicans had control of all three branches of government, they increased rather than reduced the power of the federal government, and expanded the very institutions they had earlier proposed eliminating.

And the sad part is that the ideas are so far removed from todays GOP that even trying to say things like “I support States Rights” sounds positively neanderthal.

Small government is a winning and unifying theme. It supports free-market Republicans directly. Social conservatives are free from federal interference in their religions, particularly if abortion “should be left to the states to decide”. And having a small government doesn’t preclude us from having a well-funded military committed to its mission.

I’d also echo that in the long term our nation can not survive if the liberals control our schools, our media, and our political infrastructure. We need more conservative and libertarian think-thanks, additional media outlets (how about a genuine right-wing TV station?), and to somehow encourage more right-wingers to get PhDs and take back our colleges.


143 posted on 11/04/2008 11:52:02 PM PST by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

I don’t think it’s a nonsense. There are several ladies in my ‘conservative church’ (LCMS) that don’t believe in abortion but want big government taking care. Or the other way around: I know some people who want small government but don’t care about abortion.


144 posted on 11/04/2008 11:53:49 PM PST by paudio (Nobody cried racism when Ken Blackwell, Lynn Swann, and Michael Steele lost to White guys...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
It was the actions of the corporate RINOS, the corruption, the pompous venality, and the way they empowered the left that defeated us.

Exactly. You see it on this board every day.

I called my boss the very day that Phil Gramm made that idiotic "nation of whiners" comment...and told him that we were done.

Stupid, arrogant, idiots. Reagan inspired people to greater aspirations; the current crop denied the obvious economic realities, and called the electorate names.

And then the Bush regime came up with the bailout plan, complete with a shifty-eyed mob boss (who was a large part of the problem), demanding that those who had caused the problem be paid their million dollar bonuses.

There was a coup in this country...it occurred six weeks ago.

145 posted on 11/04/2008 11:54:55 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I take solace in the fact that there are a few more like-minds at some other websites. PC has become pervasive even in conservative circles thanks to the malign influence of some former trotskyites.


146 posted on 11/04/2008 11:56:37 PM PST by Pelham (Obama: Reconstruction version 2.0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: garandgal

I will say this. The Republican Party deserved to be fired by the American people.

Of course when you fire somebody, at the time you have no guarantee that their eventual replacement will be any better. But you fire them anyway.


147 posted on 11/04/2008 11:56:42 PM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I was just reading an article where Obama actually increased with Jews and Latinos and every other “minority” and may have taken majority Catholics

good lord


148 posted on 11/04/2008 11:58:12 PM PST by wardaddy (I'm looking for a new Danelaw to move my family to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

That doesn’t surprise me. It fits with what I’ve observed in southern California.


149 posted on 11/04/2008 11:59:26 PM PST by Pelham (Obama: Reconstruction version 2.0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Roberts
Obama won, among other reasons, because traditional Republican turnout was down approximately 10%.

That's assuming 'traditional Republicans' were sitting out. I doubt that's the case. In some cases, they probably simply voted for 0bama, or they voted but 0bama's numbers are so great.

150 posted on 11/04/2008 11:59:27 PM PST by paudio (Nobody cried racism when Ken Blackwell, Lynn Swann, and Michael Steele lost to White guys...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Excuse me, but the Democrat party deserved to be fired a much longer time ago, and still deserved to be fired today.......


151 posted on 11/05/2008 12:00:12 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay
Absolutely right! It has to start by reclaiming the schools. What might help things is that if Obama bungles up badly then you, perhaps, have history repeating: Vietnam>Carter>Reagan = Iraq>Obama>? The handouts are also a problem in that a whole generation of entitlement seekers can also emerge. Why work when the government gives you money, and its for all the injustices of being black or Latino or having lazy parents who didn't raise you up right with all the middleclass advantages or, my favorite, not being a rich movie star like Brad Pitt, etc. A generation of victims in need of assistance.
152 posted on 11/05/2008 12:03:38 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: teletech
That is right. It was always people like McCain bringing the right to the left. Nobody has yet to bring the left to the right.

We should clean the leadership of the RNC up. We are going to real people. People like Sarah and Joe the plumber. To beat Obama, you are going to have to get away from the beltway.

I heard someone say we should take on the mantel of DC reformist. I like this idea. I think the first think we should champion is foreign interest money that buys our politicians off. Start pointing fingers at elected officials who accept money from China and other Countries. Something like that. Grab a issue that a Reagan Democrat could believe in too.

I don't know what will work for sure. I do know that the RINO couldn't pull enough demorats away.

153 posted on 11/05/2008 12:03:47 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing
Greetings CC:

Just in case you're simply a newbie looking for discussion, as opposed to a troll...

In 2008, there was no 72 hour Republican blitz. Let me be clear about the straw which broke the camel's GOP's back: McCain's support for the pork ladened bailout package.

We were successfully countering the media's false image of Obama, one door knock at a time; until that point. Voters absolutely resented the manner which the earmarked bill was ram-rodded through the Senate, devoid of debate! The world most deliberate body? My a$$!

Add the House ceding their legislative Constitutional authority to the executive branch, to boot! And it was at that point undecideds became hostile towards GOP canvassers like me. Undecideds understood McCain's support for the bailout was not based upon conservative ideals. McCain was behaving like a Democrat. And each and every day Ohio voters absorbed a mass media created image of Obama.

Thanks to McCain-Feingold limitations, mass media now has unchecked power. Does anybody remember why we opposed McCain-Feingold?

Cheers,
OLA

154 posted on 11/05/2008 12:07:08 AM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
That is right. It was always people like McCain bringing the right to the left. Nobody has yet to bring the left to the right.

We should clean the leadership of the RNC up. We are going to real people. People like Sarah and Joe the plumber. To beat Obama, you are going to have to get away from the beltway.

I heard someone say we should take on the mantel of DC reformist. I like this idea. I think the first think we should champion is foreign interest money that buys our politicians off. Start pointing fingers at elected officials who accept money from China and other Countries. Something like that. Grab a issue that a Reagan Democrat could believe in too.

I don't know what will work for sure. I do know that the RINO couldn't pull enough demorats away.

Exactly! No more DC politicians with their polished speeches and their talking points. We need down to earth real conservative folks that talk about conservative issues near and dear to all of us.

155 posted on 11/05/2008 12:09:05 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican

McCain ended up being hoisted on his own petard.


156 posted on 11/05/2008 12:09:50 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey
We will get through this.

No, "we" will not. I will seek my duty elsewhere. The Goldwaterites were correct, it seems to me. As a Reaganite, I intend to correct that error.

I will not be back, barring a full scale commitment to Conservatism on the part of the entire party from the ground up (which will not happen). My efforts will go toward real and consistent Conservative leadership.

157 posted on 11/05/2008 12:12:01 AM PST by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: paudio

A government that is powerful enough to “take care” of people is strong enough to take away their liberty.

You seem caught up with the single issue of abortion. If, as you say, there are many small government types who don’t care about abortion, even though Roe v Wade is a big government power grab, what’s the big deal? If they don’t care about it one way or the other, but most of their political bedfellows (the social conservatives) do, what’s so horrible about working to help the team? Like you wrote, if abortion doesn’t really matter to them, but they want small government, what is the better approach? Join with liberals who are diametrically opposed to small government on nearly every issue, or work with social conservatives (who are mostly small government) to include helping them get what they feel is important?

You can’t just expect social conservatives to work on the things you deem important without it being a two-way street.


158 posted on 11/05/2008 12:15:28 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Voted proudly for GOVERNOR Palin for VP (but not so sad that RINO McCain lost)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Sarah and Joe the Plumber in 2012

BTW - I need to get a bumper sticker that say 013013. That should be Obama’s last day in office.

159 posted on 11/05/2008 12:16:48 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
Sarah and Joe the Plumber in 2012 BTW - I need to get a bumper sticker that say 013013. That should be Obama’s last day in office.

There are those that say the world is going to end in 2012. Maybe the good Lord will look at all the damage Obama will do and say OK that's enough suffering and end the world.

160 posted on 11/05/2008 12:20:07 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson