Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I voted for John McCain
Ynet ^ | 11.04.08 | Naomi Ragen

Posted on 11/04/2008 1:15:45 PM PST by SJackson

Naomi Ragen explains why she voted for staunch patriot and not for a virtual unknown

This election – probably one of the most important in the history of America – changes all that. Faced with hostile forces which threaten all of us in the free and civilized world, Americans experienced just how dangerous their position is on Sept. 11, when their safe, protected world came crashing down on their surprised and unsuspecting heads. In this election, Americans either chose to continue fighting those forces by voting for John McCain – a staunch patriot and war hero, or to give in and give up by choosing Barack Hussein Obama, a virtual unknown who wants to slash America’s defenses, lose her war in Iraq, and start unconditional talks with homicidal maniacs that threaten us all with atomic war.

I trust John McCain on security. He is the son and grandson of four star navy admirals. He has a son serving in Iraq. He was tortured in a Vietnamese prison for five and a half years, and wouldn’t let his father – supreme commander of all US forces in that war - use his connections to get him out. He understands the importance of winning the war in Iraq to Israel’s security. As he said: “We are engaged in a basic struggle between humanity and inhumanity; between builders and destroyers. If fighting these people is not intrinsic to the national security and most cherished values of the United States, I don’t know what is.”

Barack Hussein Obama, on the other hand, is the son of a white woman from Kansas and a Black Muslim from Kenya. He has never served in the military. His spiritual mentor is Rev. Wright, a Black racist and anti-Semite who preaches “God damn America” from the pulpit. Obama calls himself a “citizen of the world,” and is popular with European haters of America. He has other close friends who hate America, including domestic terrorist Bill Ayers who blew up buildings in the ‘60s, and planned to blow up the Pentagon.

Obama is also friends with Israel-hating Rashid Khalidi who had close ties with the PLO, and indicted Syrian-American slumlord Tony Rezko. Obama has often said that one of his first acts as president will be to remove US troops from Iraq and to hold unconditional talks with a terrorist like Ahmadinejad.

The Democrats have run a very, very expensive campaign, financed by million of dollars of foreign donations (which are illegal,) including money from Arabs in Gaza, to hide these facts. They have succeeded in convincing Jews to believe what they are told, not what they should be able to see with their own eyes. It is estimated 75% of Jews will vote for Obama. They will vote for him to feel that they are “enlightened,” overcoming any prejudice against a Muslim and a Black man. They will vote for him because they have been told he will be better for the economy (He won’t. He’ll destroy the US economy with new taxes.) They will vote for him because they have no G-d, don’t really care what is best for Israel, and because they want to feel like liberal Americans who read the New York Times, not ethnic outsiders.

People like me are harder to convince. I voted for John McCain, and so did every other American in Israel I know, Jew and gentile, religious and secular.

The first election I remember clearly was that of John F. Kennedy. I was a little girl at the time, but the handsome candidate won my heart, and the election. For decades the differences between Democrats and Republicans in America have been slight, with one candidate a little more articulate or photogenic than the other, but certainly both were capable, patriotic, and experienced.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; mccain; obama

1 posted on 11/04/2008 1:15:45 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

To the original writer:

God. There, I said it. I think God wants us to say His name, and to write it. Why wouldn’t He? Anyway, if you’re going to substitute a - for the o, then you are just using a different character, but still writing His name.


2 posted on 11/04/2008 1:47:03 PM PST by webheart (All sarcasm contained in this post is intentional, and does not necessarily reflect a real opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Baruch HaShem!

Well, that’s one vote... Now all we need is 65,000,000 more and McCain can win this thing!

I voted for McCain, so now he has two votes. Of course, mine was in Illinois so it won’t count. Bummer


3 posted on 11/04/2008 1:49:36 PM PST by Doug4McCain (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug4McCain

California voter here — another one for McCain. No, he won’t likely take this state but let’s make it as close as we can, OK people???

Get out there and VOTE, all of you, even in the infamous Blue states — there are so many other important issues/offices to vote on as well.

Vote Vote Vote — IGNORE all exit polls and the media — keep voting!!!


4 posted on 11/04/2008 1:55:24 PM PST by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: webheart; SJackson
"if you’re going to substitute a - for the o, then you are just using a different character"

Shhh! This is a sophisticated encryption algorithm. Don't give anyone any hints on how to crack it.

5 posted on 11/04/2008 1:56:53 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaCon
I have been openly anti-McCain for years. If he does win the election, I just believe that he will be leading us toward a Western European style future at a slightly more tolerable rate than Obama.

That being said there was really no one else even close to vote for. I would have gone with my own party (American Independence) but that nutjob Keyes got himself inserted at the last minute.

What a waste.

6 posted on 11/04/2008 1:59:52 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I voted for MCCAIN because I have an IQ over 20.


7 posted on 11/04/2008 2:35:10 PM PST by liberalism is a mental disorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart
It has nothing to do with writing, rather destruction. A simple explanation. In an internet context, while there's no direct prohibition in the minds of most, there is a concern that a reader might print out an article, then destroy it, thus many writers will use the hyphen. You'll note the prohibition against erasure is direct.

here

Writing the Name of God

Jews do not casually write any Name of God. This practice does not come from the commandment not to take the Lord's Name in vain, as many suppose. In Jewish thought, that commandment refers solely to oath-taking, and is a prohibition against swearing by God's Name falsely or frivolously (the word normally translated as "in vain" literally means "for falsehood").

Judaism does not prohibit writing the Name of God per se; it prohibits only erasing or defacing a Name of God. However, observant Jews avoid writing any Name of God casually because of the risk that the written Name might later be defaced, obliterated or destroyed accidentally or by one who does not know better.

The commandment not to erase or deface the name of God comes from Deut. 12:3. In that passage, the people are commanded that when they take over the promised land, they should destroy all things related to the idolatrous religions of that region, and should utterly destroy the names of the local deities. Immediately afterwards, we are commanded not to do the same to our God. From this, the rabbis inferred that we are commanded not to destroy any holy thing, and not to erase or deface a Name of God.

It is worth noting that this prohibition against erasing or defacing Names of God applies only to Names that are written in some kind of permanent form, and recent rabbinical decisions have held that writing on a computer is not a permanent form, thus it is not a violation to type God's Name into a computer and then backspace over it or cut and paste it, or copy and delete files with God's Name in them. However, once you print the document out, it becomes a permanent form. That is why observant Jews avoid writing a Name of God on web sites like this one or in newsgroup messages: because there is a risk that someone else will print it out and deface it.

Normally, we avoid writing the Name by substituting letters or syllables, for example, writing "G-d" instead of "God." In addition, the number 15, which would ordinarily be written in Hebrew as Yod-Hei (10-5), is normally written as Teit-Vav (9-6), because Yod-Hei is a Name. See Hebrew Alphabet for more information about using letters as numerals.


8 posted on 11/04/2008 4:02:06 PM PST by SJackson (I don't believe that people should be able to own guns, BH Obama to John Lott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson