Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
A liberal judge previously ruled that court-appointed Republican poll watchers could be removed from their boards by an on-site election judge, citing their "minority" status as cause. A liberal judge previously ruled that court-appointed Republican poll watchers could be removed from their boards by an on-site election judge, citing their "minority" status as cause.

"previously ruled"
Where's the appeal? Where's the friggen U.S. Attorney?

This is bull.

16 posted on 11/04/2008 5:30:20 AM PST by Condor51 (The only difference between Bill Ayers and Timothy McVeigh is the body count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Condor51

Current version of the story says the judge said they could NOT be removed. Maybe the earlier version had a typo.


43 posted on 11/04/2008 7:08:08 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Condor51
The part of the article you quoted had an error in it ... they fixed it, or tried to ... the put the "NOT" in the wrong place.

A Pennsylvania judge previously ruled that court-appointed poll watchers could be NOT removed from their boards by an on-site election judge, but that is exactly what is happening, according to sources on the ground.

So ... the judge actually ruled that the court-appointed poll watchers could not be removed, but they were removed anyway. I believe it is time to rule all votes from those precincts where this happened invalid, and cite this cause. If they whine and complain ... shoot them.
47 posted on 11/04/2008 7:12:38 AM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson