See post 36, in which I provided an update:
Update folks. I just checked http://www.whatsyourevidence.com - a rather (!) anti-Berg site. They have not posted this reported decision, and have added a note that they have information that it may not be “real.”
Given that that site has every “reason” to post information that contradicts Berg’s case, and still is calling reports of this case into question, I consider that a rather big deal, so am posting that as an update here.
Now I don’t know what to believe - and recognize that i’ll get flamed for this - but this poster’s prior posts on ObamaCrimes sounded very believable.
In the interest of full disclosure, am posting this as FYI.
Thank you very much; these are by far the links leading to the most well researched information so far posted. The Michigan Law Review article is particularly very well done. What is disturbing is that in the end it will seem to the public and is all very political and leaves us with the impression that a president of the United States can have gained office through false representations and there is no remedy for it. I wonder if there are not in fact legal avenues at least possible that are not covered in the linked material.