Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

HS, the candidate needs to satisfy the conditions of eligibility, and he needs to do it now. McCain showed his because when this issue first cropped up Bozo and the boys switched it to McCain being born out of the country totally ignoring the fact he was born to two US citizens, one of whom was military personnel, making him a citizen even if he had been born on the moon. Bozo has offered no proof and the point is this: If he has a valid vault copy of his BC then why isn’t he showing it? Why keep showing a COLB over and over and sealing his real BC? Your arguments are not essential to this judgement. The judges in these cases should go ahead(in fact they have a duty to do so) and order Bozo to produce a vault copy of his BC because if he is a citizen then fine,if not then not so fine. Showing a BC in no way violates his civil rights nor infringes on his freedom. To argue otherwise is to argue for fraud.


26 posted on 11/03/2008 12:28:09 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: calex59

I’m on your side. Really. We can’t win without presenting a compelling LEGAL argument. Whining coulda/woulda/shoulda isn’t enough.

The COLB shows the location of birth as Hawaii. It is certified as a true representation of the BC. End of Obama’s argument at this point, until someone presents a compelling LEGAL counter-argument. Whining “that’s not good enough!” isn’t enough.

Ok, maybe there is reason to show that a COLB isn’t enough. You have to provide a LEGAL justification of why that isn’t enough, such as finding someone else’s COLB showing they’re born here _and_ a BC showing they aren’t. THEN you have to show why the judge should care about YOU and your complaint, that you actually have standing (which, at this point, nobody has because he’s just a name on a ballot representing electors).

As for the privacy of the BC, how ‘bout I go get a copy of yours and publish it? Most jurisdictions rightfully limit access to personal BCs. One should have compelling LEGAL reason to access it.

The core point: you must be able to show _in_existing_law_ why BHO must reveal his BC. Good luck. If your response is another variation of “but he SHOULD...”, don’t bother. I agree with you, but that’s not going to get us anywhere.


29 posted on 11/03/2008 12:53:09 PM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson