Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MCCAIN-PALIN LANDSLIDE
Marston Chronicles ^ | Marston

Posted on 11/03/2008 7:56:56 AM PST by Infidel Puppy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: mlo

I have no idea if this analysis is valid or not- but your reason is possibly flawed. Pumas have from the beginning said they would tell pollsters they were going to vote Obama. I have no idea why this is part of their strategy, but it is.


81 posted on 11/03/2008 10:50:22 AM PST by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: marron

“Now, thats encouraging.

My impression is that more Dems are crossing over by far than Republicans. A lot of older Dems will vote McCain, likewise a lot of blue-collar Dems, just as a cultural thing. Most of the sit-it-out Repubs have been convinced to vote. Most of the non-political evangelicals have been convinced to vote, and most of them will go McCain. McCain will do slightly better among jewish voters than Bush did last time.”

In my opinion, when someone calls asking for you to tell who you’re voting for, you may feel ashamed to say McCain. If someone calls supporting McCain asking for you to vote for him, you will be more than happy to talk to them. That’s my opinion, and I dunno how much weight it will hold, but it makes sense to me.


82 posted on 11/03/2008 10:53:58 AM PST by ConstantConservative (Keep pushing Freepers & PUMA's, we're making a difference!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Wow...somewhere along the line it seems I mistakenly took you for the original poster of this thread. My apologies...

FTR...I was not attempting to be condescending by any of my posts.

83 posted on 11/03/2008 11:13:21 AM PST by EnigmaticAnomaly ("Democrats: Seeking an easy life at someone else's expense for 150 years")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly

I never post anything interesting enough for someone to want to duplicate. lol


84 posted on 11/03/2008 11:15:48 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (In VP's, McCain picked the future, Obama chose the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BlessingsofLiberty

Thank you for the advice. It was the best reply I got - yet. I will lean back and wait till the Nov. 5th. I hope you do the same.
Thank you


85 posted on 11/03/2008 11:15:52 AM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Sir , my wife told me to set things straight. I’m an Obama supporter - but I wrote my comment out of my own convition. I know the candidates only out of the media.
Excuse my poor English.


86 posted on 11/03/2008 11:16:10 AM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38

What McCain has to offer is far better than the disaster that would happen if Obama were to be sworn in as president. McCain’s presidency would not be ‘a continuation of the last 8 years”. By the way, Bush was a better president than people give him credit for and McCain will be far better than Obama.

Ask many of the Cubans living in Florida what they think of Obama. They recognize Obama’s rhetoric. They heard it in Cuba. They know socialism when they see it.

And I agree with another poster here - stick around, read and learn.

Welcome to Free Republic!


87 posted on 11/03/2008 11:24:04 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38
Sir , my wife told me to set things straight. I’m an Obama supporter - but I wrote my comment out of my own convition. I know the candidates only out of the media.

Thank you for your honesty.

You might find that if you spend a few hours on here and learn the TRUTH about Obama (as opposed to the misconceptions spread by the media), that you would no longer support Obama.

88 posted on 11/03/2008 11:26:51 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Infidel Puppy

Easy money to be made on intrade.com.


89 posted on 11/03/2008 11:28:07 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Who's going to vote for a Muslim/Marxist named Barrack Hussein Oboma after 9/11?

I was listening to a Podcast of an liberal internet radio show today, "The Faulking Truth X2". Faulk stated something about certain folks not voting for Obama because, like you said, "Who'd vote for a Muslim after 9/11?" He then went on to say, "Using that logic, who'd vote for an ex-military guy after the OKC bombing?"

His comparison is flawed. I wonder why he and other libs like him can't see that many (if not all) factions of Islam teach their followers to hate infidels? In fact McVeigh was their friend, too.

90 posted on 11/03/2008 11:42:44 AM PST by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

I am a PUMA.
Do not believe the polls, do not believe the media.
I find it humorous that the press makes such a big deal out of one or two Repubs that happen to be voting for BO but they dismiss PUMA’s as insignificant and a Repub. inside job?
There are more of us than you think. The PUMA vote may or may not make a difference in states that went for BO in the primary, but watch out for the ones that went for Hillary, like PA and OH.
At this point it is not even about Hillary anymore, although that is how the whole movement germinated.
We're (former)dems that are fully aware of how incompetent and risky BO and for many of us, we are voting for a Repub for the first time.
Whether voter fraud will offset this, I do not know, but I am hopeful that we can pull out a victory.
I hope that all of you that have lost hope and will not vote, will vote third party of vote for BO to teach the GOP a lesson about nominating a candidate that is not conservative enough for you will reconsider.
91 posted on 11/03/2008 11:43:46 AM PST by JamieJosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38
Sorry - I’m a stupid foreigner from abraod. What change do you claim. With that ticket there is no change - it is the continuation of the last 8 years.

GHW Bush did not continue the great eight years he preceded as VP, hence is failing bid at re-election. There is no indication whatever that Al Gore would have continued the exact policies that were propounded by the eight years of Clinton, in fact, he was proposing many changes. Sen. McCain isn't even the sitting vice-president! You people who continue to spout this "continuation" folderol demonstrate that you truly do not understand how this country works, stupid foreigner or stupid citizen alike.

92 posted on 11/03/2008 11:47:12 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Yep. I see Obama winning with 278 and winning 0 Southern states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin.


93 posted on 11/03/2008 11:48:06 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JamieJosh

Great Post!

PLEASE tell your other friends who are Dems the same thing you are telling us.

18 million voted for Hillary, McCain only needs about a half a million PUMAs.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123557/posts


94 posted on 11/03/2008 12:01:33 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Sir - I’m a thick head (my relatives over here and in the US can testify that). So we can have a discussion about politics. You have your point of view and I have mine. That is ok.
Have a good time (privatly) - regards.


95 posted on 11/03/2008 12:08:42 PM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

I’ll take that “stupid foreigner”
You confuse me: is Sen McCain the candidate for VP? Who is the candidate for president?


96 posted on 11/03/2008 12:08:56 PM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38
You confuse me: is Sen McCain the candidate for VP? Who is the candidate for president?

You are confusing the fact that Sen. McCain running as a Republican with the idea that merely BECAUSE he is a Republican, he intends to continue with the policies of the previous president, G. W. Bush, also a Republican.

I mentioned the vice-presidents in recent history who ran for president after their term as vice-president, point out that GHW Bush lost his bid for re-election because he failed to continue the popular policies of his Republican predecessor, and Al Gore, who made comments to indicate he would not be continuing the policies of his Democrat predecessor. If these men were not continuing the policies of the administration that they actually were a part of, why do you, an admitted 0bama supporter, and 0bama himself, constantly try to say a senator who happens to be of the same party would push four more years of an administration he is NOT a part of? A McCain Administration would not look like a Bush Administration, different people, different agenda, different philosophies regarding government spending, to name just three.

It is nothing more than error to continue to believe and repeat the idea that just because Sen. McCain is Republican, his administration will be no more than a carbon copy of the last administration. I hope this clarifies my point to you.

97 posted on 11/03/2008 12:38:45 PM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38

“Sen. McCain isn’t even the sitting vice-president!”
I thought he is the presidential candidate - that is confusing me.
Im not that stupid as I told you - I beg your pardon.


98 posted on 11/03/2008 1:04:39 PM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: barbarossa38

Typo - sorry
we can’t have a political discussion. It doesn’t make sense :).


99 posted on 11/03/2008 1:05:03 PM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

Thank you for your answer.
The most you said I accept. But - but this election is a break-up of the normal elections. It is nothing you are used to.
You, the republicans, didn’t find a recipe to fight Obama. He was fair, calm and practical. It is an election-style that is very unusually for Americans.
I beg your pardon - my time has come. It is ten o’ clock in the evening over here and I’m an old man (70years :) )
Regards to you


100 posted on 11/03/2008 1:08:13 PM PST by barbarossa38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson