To: plain talk
Even that part of the argument makes no logical sense. He says that the “huge sums” in greenhouse gas penalties that companies will have to pay will generate all of these dollars — but also admits that the companies will be forced into bankruptcy by these huge penalties, thereby negating the whole plan. HELLO!!
To: RepublitarianRoger2
Even that part of the argument makes no logical sense. He says that the huge sums in greenhouse gas penalties that companies will have to pay will generate all of these dollars but also admits that the companies will be forced into bankruptcy by these huge penalties, thereby negating the whole plan. HELLO!!
Good analysis.
178 posted on
11/02/2008 6:22:31 AM PST by
FTL
To: RepublitarianRoger2
also admits that the companies will be forced into bankruptcy by these huge penalties, thereby negating the whole planFrom a sustainability standpoint you are obviously right. Not sure they have thought that far ahead. They are like locusts. They plunder and then move on and graze elsewhere I suppose.
To: RepublitarianRoger2
This is the “money for nothing plan” for the I Want My MTV generation.
385 posted on
11/02/2008 11:22:34 AM PST by
floriduh voter
(AYERS' BOOK PRAIRIE FIRE dedicated to sirhan sirhan, Robert Kennedy's killer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson