Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mathwhizz
Just look at the undecideds. Not your typical Obama voter.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 11/01/2008 8:22:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

Wait til the “undecides” catch a glimpse of the Wright ad showinging in Va.


7 posted on 11/01/2008 8:24:53 PM PDT by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop

http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_1027_635.aspx

The Bradley/Wilder Effect

By Hastings Wyman

Southern Political Report

October 27, 2008 — It is probably the secret “Great White Hope” of some Republicans. And if by some miracle John McCain wins, it will undoubtedly become the Democrats’ accepted explanation for Barack Obama’s loss. It is the much-discussed “Bradley effect,” or in the South, the “Wilder effect.” It is the — unproved — assertion that some white voters tell pollsters they are either undecided or plan to vote for the black candidate, then vote for the white candidate. The supposition is that these voters fear they would exhibit, or reveal, racial prejudice if they told the pollster they were voting for the white candidate.
The theory is named for two elections. In 1989, Doug Wilder (D), an African American, won the governorship of Virginia by a narrow 50.2% to 49.8% over Marshall Coleman (R), his white opponent. Pre-election polls showed Wilder would win by a larger margin. A late October survey for the Washington Post gave Wilder 52%, Coleman 37%. In the Mason-Dixon poll taken about the same time as the Post’s survey, Wilder had 48%, Coleman 44%. Mason-Dixon’s Brad Coker points out, “If you give Wilder all the ‘undecided’ blacks and Coleman all the ‘undecided’ whites, it comes out at 50%-50%.” (In any case, Wilder got about 40% of the white vote; were Obama to replicate this, he would carry most of the South.)

-snip-


11 posted on 11/01/2008 8:25:27 PM PDT by Chet 99 (Vote McCain/Palin, or this will be our future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTb5EFZmgbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop

Just look at the undecideds. Not your typical Obama voter

True, but most are not thinking about Mark Warner...that changes the entire question. Are these folks going for Mark Warner but still the Republican President or not sure of which presidential candidate, but absolutely voting Mark Warner...that would be nice to know.


18 posted on 11/01/2008 8:26:30 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson