Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP: 'Terkel's Politics Were Liberal, Vintage FDR'
NewsBusters ^ | 11/1/2008 | Mike Bates

Posted on 11/01/2008 9:51:55 AM PDT by Mike Bates

Studs Terkel, author and broadcaster, died on Halloween. Barack Obama observed: "Studs was not just a Chicago institution, he was a national treasure. His writings, broadcasts, and interviews shed light on what it meant to be an American in the 20th century." Obama highly praised Terkel when he was alive, declaring him " not just a national treasure - he's one of Chicago's treasures." Terkel's appeal to liberals may at least partially be explained by his political activities. The Associated Press today reports:

Terkel's politics were liberal, vintage FDR. He would never forget the many New Deal programs from the Great Depression and worried that the country suffered from "a national Alzheimer's disease" that made government the perceived enemy.

So what does the Associated Press view as liberal, vintage FDR politics? An October, 1952 Chicago Tribune news article began:

"Louis (Studs) Terkel, disc jockey, TV entertainer, and one-time political broadcaster, declined yesterday to discuss charges by Owen Vinson that Vinson joined the Communist party in 1943 at the invitation of Terkel.

"Vinson, former Chicago radio writer, director, and actor, made the charge Thursday in Los Angeles before the house committee on un-American activities. Vinson has left the party, he testified." At least one other person also provided sworn testimony that he had joined the party at Terkel's invitation.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; terkel

1 posted on 11/01/2008 9:51:55 AM PDT by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

I wonder if Studs “early voted.”


2 posted on 11/01/2008 9:55:53 AM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Studs Terkel was a Socialist..and he made no bones about it. I never read anything he wrote. But my brilliant dad, a writer himself, told me that Terkel was one of the most overrated writers of his generation.


3 posted on 11/01/2008 9:57:07 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Liberal or not (he was) I still enjoyed his books and unique style of writing.


4 posted on 11/01/2008 9:57:22 AM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Terkel was a Commie.


5 posted on 11/01/2008 9:57:44 AM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Even if he did, no doubt he’ll be voting again on Tuesday. It’s the “Chicago way.”


6 posted on 11/01/2008 9:58:00 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Whenever the LA Times runs an obituary of an old communist, they always refer to him/her as a “social activist”. It’s their benign code word for “Stalinist”.

Kind of like “community organizer”.


7 posted on 11/01/2008 9:58:15 AM PDT by Argus (Obama: All turban and no goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
I've read some of his stuff.

It is like a dumbed-down Steinbeck - communism with a patina of folksy Americana.
8 posted on 11/01/2008 10:02:12 AM PDT by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Whatever you want to call him, he was proud of it. I will give him that.
9 posted on 11/01/2008 10:05:41 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Growing up in Chicago, I heard Studs many, many times on the radio. I would characterize him more as a Eugene V. Debs/Joe Hill type of Wobbly.


10 posted on 11/01/2008 10:12:42 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Obamanomics: That'll leave some Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Two of Terkel's books, Working and Hard Times were among my favorites when I was in high school. I detected a strange flavor in the common theme in them, which I couldn't really describe. I went to college and was treated to weekly visits from our local trotskyists. I figured it out then, but still had a problem. Terkel was a well known author, pundit, raconteur, mainstream new-dealer. The commies were the unwritten conclusion.
11 posted on 11/01/2008 10:21:05 AM PDT by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Exactly.


12 posted on 11/01/2008 10:22:39 AM PDT by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

I read The Good War. That was enough Turkel for me.


13 posted on 11/01/2008 10:24:35 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Everything about this guy was “affected”, including his phony first name. I had a liberal educator (oxymoron or just moron?) for a boss 30 years ago. Made me read his book “Working”. As an earlier poster said: “over rated.”

Oldplayer

14 posted on 11/01/2008 10:49:50 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
AP: 'Terkel's Politics Were Liberal, Vintage FDR'

And the New Deal was socialistic, his cabinet choke full of communists and worst of all, prolonged the Great Depression.
15 posted on 11/01/2008 11:05:02 AM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

I had to read the Studs Terkel book “Working” in a sociology class in college. The teacher, obviously liberal, thought he was the greatest thing since sliced bread. The book was about how bad life was for various working class people such as garbage men, and how they were trapped in mindless jobs. I had the temerity to ask why people who hated their jobs didn’t go back to school and get some kind of training or simply look for another job, as so many other people do. I was severely reprimanded for not understanding what life was really like in the US. The book was badly written and a load of leftist crap.


16 posted on 11/01/2008 11:08:40 AM PDT by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Terkel wrote some interesting books, but he was a hard-core communist to the end. If you want to be a communist (or a liberal), be open about it. I have no problem saying I’m a conservative. Come on all you commies out there, (especially you Barack) have some courage and honesty and admit it.


17 posted on 11/01/2008 11:20:03 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"overrated writers"

Most of Terkel's books I read consisted of him asking people questions about their lives. I never discerned any particular literary talent he had, even though the books were interesting. "Division Street:America" where he interviewed a number of people from different ethnic and socio-economic backgrounds, was a decent book.

18 posted on 11/01/2008 11:22:38 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson