Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's funny/sad how the regions of the country that may hit the most by Obama's tax increases (California and the Northeast) are supporting him the most.
1 posted on 11/01/2008 7:31:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

I better print this article and place it on the windshields of all the Mercedes, BMW’s and Lexus SUVs I see crowding the parking lot of our Whole Foods store. Most adorened with Obama bumber stickers!


2 posted on 11/01/2008 7:33:31 AM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I wonder how effective unionization would be in the retail sector. While I know that many grocery stores are unionized (I try to avoid shopping at these as I feel that unions are the enemy), working in a grocery store itself would probably be considered an unskilled trade. Wal-Mart and other anti-union retailers have been able to make quick work out of any organization efforts, even in countries where “card check” policies are in place.
3 posted on 11/01/2008 7:34:39 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
an arugula gap...?
4 posted on 11/01/2008 7:34:47 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

My husband just said O must have read Robin Hood everyday when he was young.


5 posted on 11/01/2008 7:35:45 AM PDT by Faith-Hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This is one retailer I will not miss.


6 posted on 11/01/2008 7:36:38 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Key paragraph from story:

“Whole Foods could face the dual challenge of higher taxes on its core customers (highend households) and possible unionization efforts. While certainly not all Whole Foods’ customers have incomes above $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for couples, the concentration of these income groups in Whole Foods’ market strongholds of the Northeast and California, suggests that there could be some incremental pressure on sales in 2009.”


8 posted on 11/01/2008 7:40:58 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I wonder what effect, if any, ‘Food Stamps’ and other “free food” government programs have on grocery stores.


9 posted on 11/01/2008 7:46:33 AM PDT by KoRn (Barack Obama Must Be Stopped!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Obama win bad for all fools!


11 posted on 11/01/2008 7:49:06 AM PDT by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
It's funny/sad how the regions of the country that may hit the most by Obama's tax increases (California and the Northeast) are supporting him the most.

Heh. I tell that to all my lib friends who whine about taxes... "Wait a sec... I thought your man Biden said paying taxes is patriotic! What are you complaining about?"

12 posted on 11/01/2008 7:52:28 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So true!

I love the Whole Foods variety and quality but detest their
politics.

Thrilled that I now have another choice in CO. Sprouts claims
they are 1/3 the price and so far no inkling they are huge
lefties.

Spend accordingly.


13 posted on 11/01/2008 7:53:22 AM PDT by Lesforlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I am going to engage in a little pop psychology here, so bear with me...

It seems to me that a large part of the appeal of Whole Foods, and the reason people put up with the additional inconvenience and expense, is so they can feel better than the general society. They are dis-satisfied with the political discourse and the President, so they feel the need to be smarter, more concerned, and more compassionate than the society they disdain.

So they shop at Whole Foods, which satisfies their psychological need. Everything in the store is telling them that they are better than those who don’t shop there. They are more aware of environmental hazards, which shows they are more intelligent. They believe in “Fair Trade”, which shows they are more compassionate. They are deeply concerned about “Global Warming”, which means they are dedicated to something more than themselves.

People want to feel good about themselves, and Whole Foods knows that they will pay big bucks for it. The problem, of course, is that each of these “concerns” is ‘ginned up pseudo-scientific bullshit, and all the money and effort does not improve anything about anything, except for Whole Foods’ bottom line.

Now, if all of these customers suddenly love the President, and feel good about the way the country is going, why are they going to have to shell out money to have these feel-good needs met by Whole Foods, when Barack Obama is handing out absolution for free?


14 posted on 11/01/2008 7:53:54 AM PDT by gridlock (18 Million Democrats voted for Hillary in the primaries. Are they all racists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Am sure they will at least see a short-term jump in organic arugala sales....


15 posted on 11/01/2008 7:54:10 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Easy to understand. Most have sudden wealth syndrome. It is a very strange thing that occurs mostly in Silicon Valley and causes a feeling similar to white guilt.


17 posted on 11/01/2008 7:54:55 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

i think the last straw for me came when a co-worker spent something like $10.00 on a bag of “gourmet”, organic cat food from whole paycheck, because he was concerned about all the nasty bits that come from generic retail pet food.

two minor questions

HOW DO YOU MAKE RENDERED OFFAL “GOURMET” AND “ORGANIC”

and

WHY WOULD IT MATTER TO A CAT?!?!

just sayin’


19 posted on 11/01/2008 7:57:46 AM PDT by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
What is even more ironic is the grocery store with the most liberal magazines will be nit the most by Obama...every liberal propaganda magazine is at the checkout in those stores....
21 posted on 11/01/2008 8:10:24 AM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So, an Obama win will benefit Kroger, which is headquartered in conservative Cincinnati? Rather ironic. Actually, I think the biggest winners will be the Albrecht family who owns Aldi and Trader Joe’s.


23 posted on 11/01/2008 8:28:14 AM PDT by Bookbuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’ll have a tough time holding down food if Obama wins.


24 posted on 11/01/2008 8:33:34 AM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The real choice for yuppies on November 4 is not McCain-Obama. It is Obama-Whole Foods.


27 posted on 11/01/2008 8:55:32 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson