I was merely stating fact. Not offering and opinion.
I agree with you that Limbaugh could have been more aggressive about this issue, but I must confess, that I was disclaiming my comments about this a few months ago by indicating which comments were under the influence of the tin-foil hat.
What is most striking is Obama’s refusal to address the issue on the merits. Just show the damned original birth certificate
In dealing with the democRATs I have taken the tack of looking at the end game. In this case the end game is a constitutionally ineligable candidate declared teh winner of the contest. Creating the necessary requirement for a call for a constitutional convention.
As with the convention of 1787 which was called to amend the articles of confederation, they emerged with a completely new document. Same here, with new rights to health care, and housing, sodomy and abortion, while gun rights and free speech would be severely restricted or eliminated. They could even say that the Koran is the highest authority and institute Sharia law if they could get the majority of state legislatures controlled by democRATS to vote to ratify such a new document.
The key to all of this is the end game. Look out to the horizon, not at you feet. Look to see where they want to go in the far future rather than in just a few months.
That’s the key. The judicial system must justify itself under Quo Warranto. Combine Spanish and Portoguese and end up in Latin. Under what authority? Under what rules? Based upon what decision? This must be answered directly and clearly. This is the way to deal with the foaming gay radicals in CA. No CA SC judge will want to deal with it in a public forum to justify theirself.