[cogitator]

No, that would be something from last January. I was thinking of something that came out today. (You post it and you lead the discussion. Feel free to disparage the data, results, methodology, conclusions, and guiding alarmist philosophy of the researchers. I don't want to get involved. I told TSR that I thought somebody would post this, I'm surprised nobody has yet. I guess they're waiting for me to paint a target on my *ss. Not gonna do it.)

It's Official: People are Warming the Poles

[xcamel]

From the company that is now bringing you the “all global warming channel”

Same data, massaged by the same alarmists, all fighting for the same government science grants, towing the same old line, finding a pretty new package and bow for the same bucket of sh*t every week.

[Old Professer]

This seems to be like the story the author(s) Stott had published in January concerning old vs new ice in the Arctic; you do know that he and his colleagues are fulltime contributors to the IPCC, don’t you.

In this latest case he has taken some sparse data from the southern polar area and more available northern polar area and run them through several of his models designed to show human influence more than to rule it out.

With no referenced study here I would reserve judgment as a juror before the evidence was corroborated by less-biased peer review.

He is still guessing that calving is increased by general warming events rather than as yet discovered natural forces.

Simple correlation is encouraging but not conclusive, IMO.

Selling a climate tax globally is going to be mighty tough for a while.