[raybbr]

By the way, even at the state level, talk of a “constitutional convention” has the secondary goal of getting all citizens used to the idea so that it would be easier for Obammie the Commie to amend the USC with his commie crap.

Just feeling kind of ornery, are you?

The state of Connecticut's Constitution requires this referendum every twenty years. It's the only time the people can have a direct vote on something. Otherwise the thieves in the legislature will continue to have their way.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

OK, sorry to launch from your story about the state constitution to the USC.

But yes, I am uptight. One of the issues the Marxists have been pushing for since the 1980’s is a second constitutional convention. With the recordings that have been released recently with Hussein Obama talking about the “flaws” of the USC and wishing he could essentially build into it (or rebuild it through a 2nd CC) every socialist/Marxist item from the manifesto has me very worried.

If a state needs to review their constitution — as mandated by that constitution — fine, go ahead and review it and make changes. When I see the phrase “Constitutional Convention” though, I freak. The purpose of constitutional convention is to completely revamp an existing constitution or scrap the existing altogether to draft a new one.

That Obama thinks he is more intelligent than our Founding Fathers and that HE (the “anointed” one) can improve it, sickens me then turns me into a raving lunatic.