And there is no credible evidence indicating that he wasn't born in the U.S. either.
There exists an international protocol about what constitutes a legal birth certificate.
And where might that be documented?
If he cannot show he is native born American then he should not be running for president. It’s really no more complicated than that.
I'm afraid it is. There is no law outlining who is responsible for ensuring candidates meet all Constitutional requirements or how that is done. Since Obama isn't playing, the only other alternative is for someone to produce evidence showing he was born elsewhere. And to date nobody has done that.
Cutting through your specious arguments—I understand you to say that the Constitutional requirement that only native born Americans can be President is meaningless.
I suppose our God given right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness is meaningless, too. You probably feel more comfortable believing that our rights come from a particular government—or even the two-bit elitist politicians that comprise that government.
Tell me, Non-Sequitur, is there any part of the Constitution that has any meaning for you? Or, as the Marxist Onada has said, is it “fundamentally flawed”?
Oh, by the way, the mechanism for challenging a US Presidential candidate’s citizenship is the courts. The Messiah’s citizenship status is being challenged in the courts. Moreover, the burden of proof of citizenship is the responsibility of the candidate being challenged. The legal challenge to the Marxist Onada’s candidacy has yet to be played out.
The protocol for birth certificates is included in the diplomatic agreements countries have with each other.